by The Car Family

For more reviews go to

http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/

We think the Lexus RX 450 hybrid is the “Queen of the SUVs” based on its command of the road, ability to care for its citizens, and the price you have to pay for its attentions. Priced around $50,000 (US) this Lexus is the first luxury SUV hybrid on the market and it is going to be difficult to compete against. It is that good. As for the gas only version of the Lexus, labeled the RX 350 and about $10,000 less, it too is the gold standard of luxury SUVs and easily the most refined of its ilk. However, it doesn’t provide the gusto of some competitors and is not so inclined to venture up inclines or tolerate hard cornering. If you insist on using your SUV as a sports car leave Lexus land for the world of BMW and Acura.

We tested both Lexus RX models in all types of situations and they never became uncivil despite heavy traffic, rain, Hummer drivers who have not yet realized they are not on the battlefield. It was a lady at all times, but what made it more remarkable was the little things that sold us such as the best interior night lighting ever. The Lexus has illuminated sill plates, door handles. foot wells, the ignition ring, glove box, center console box, and front cup holders not to mention the map and cargo area maps.

Added to this mix are an easy to activate power hatch, rear seat backs that are adjustable for rake, and a flawless reputation for quality and thus high resale. The turning radius is much better than previous models and you can easily park it. Unfortunately, the rear vision is impaired and so we highly tout the video camera that places a live image of what is happening in back of the RX on the center display monitor. Very trick and very useful. In fact the only real option is the rear entertainment center and, perhaps, GPS.

Both models come with power rear hatch openers, programmable garage door openers, electric steering, heated outside mirrors that automatically dim, and so many other features it can overwhelm your objectivity. We can’t image what fixing some of the complex electrical components is going to cost after the warranty expires. Since we own four Lexus products we can attest to the good relations most dealers offer.

The problem we were trying to solve is whether the expensive hybrid version was worth the extra thousands of dollars even given the high price of fuel. Since the hybrid only comes well loaded it can cost nearly $10,000 more than the base RX. However, if you equip your base RX with similar options such as leather and all wheel drive the price differential is about $5,000 additional for the hybrid. And since the gas hybrid consistently gets 22 mpg and the hybrid only about 30 percent better in real world driving does it pay to buy the expensive 450h even when some government agencies offer a tax credit for hybrid owners?

To cover ourselves we’ll just say, “depends.” If you drive on open highways at speed stick with the RX 350. It is a faithful companion, although not one that caters to tracking down BMWs. If you do over half of your driving in town the 450h is your best bet. In bumper-to-bumper traffic you can drive up to 30 mph just on battery power and you could easily cover 500 miles on a tank of gas. The electric motors combined with the gas engine provide 268 horsepower instantly without much ado from the continuously variable transmission. Even the 450’s handling is better than that of the 350 RX model. Getting 24 or 25 miles to the gallon is not difficult in mixed driving, but even at that unless you drive well over 25,000 miles a year and gas is priced at $3,50 a gallon it would take you years to justify paying extra for the hybrid. Regardless the really good news for 2012 is that the hybrid uses regular fuel and this is a real money saver.

Resale is going to be stout regardless of which model you select as it has one of the best resale values of any vehicle. On the other hand the Audi Q5 gets nearly the same gas mileage as the 450h, costs a bit less, and only lacks some interior size to make it compatible. Drive the Audi and both the 350 and 450 to make the best decision. If you just want gas mileage, the Chevrolet Equinox does exceptionally well.

We are sure though, that the hybrid version of the RX is going to command top dollar for many a year for three reasons. It is responsive, responsible, and realistic. It does not feign to be something it isn’t. Yes it can go off road and do well, but why spend that much money to rough up a vehicle? Secondly, safety first is embedded everywhere from airbags to braking to preventive tipping measures. Finally, it can realistically hold five adults. It does not pretend to hold seven as some SUVS do, two of whom may have to crawl over seats, people, and luggage to find their perches just inches away from the rear hatch and potential danger should there be an accident. Speaking of which the crash scores are very good.

Mom’s view: This is what it must be like to have twins; so alike and yet so different. The 350 RX is blissful to drive, a little overly protective in the way it deals with road imperfections, and has just enough acceleration so you have to keep a vigil on the speedometer. The 450h is another matter. The larger tires and rims, aggressive suspension, hefty weight, and the instant torque provided by the electric motors turn this into more of a fighter. Both would be delightful children, but I think most mothers wouldn’t mind boasting of the 450h’s ability to excel even though it may require a higher tuition.

Whether you are driving the hybrid or the RX 350 the seats are both supportive and comfortable. This is a rare combination and worthy of exaltation. Getting into the hybrid requires added leg lift because it rides a tad higher, but once inside you have excellent vision to the sides and front. Unlike the unique Toyota Prius hybrid, there is very little different about these two Lexi outside of some minor trim pieces. Even the interior is akin except for the information center and a readout that shows which energy source you are using. That is not to say it does not have appeal as its abundance of storage space, good cupholders, and even a place for a purse make it very accommodating. The leather, switchgear, and plastics are well done and, if you choose carefully, nicely color coordinated. Add to this the solid basic structure and you have a SUV that gets above average fuel mileage in either hybrid or gas only versions, and you have the reasons that this is the best selling Lexus ever.                                                                                                                                    RX 450h

Dad’s view: The Lexus is stealth like and nearly impossible to identify from a distance over its more traditionally powered clone. This quickly changes once you check out the drivetrain. The hybrid 450h carries 300 pounds of extra weight, but this is offset when the two electric motors and the gas engine work together to provide instant acceleration. In our test car one electric motor helps to drive the front wheels and one the back. A continuous variable transmission on the hybrid does its work efficiently. The hybrid also has been trained to shut down at long stops. It starts instantly once you remove your foot from the brake and touch the gas pedal. In case you are wondering the stereo, air conditioning, and lights all continue to operate even with the engine paused, but the engine may restart after when the draw becomes worrisome for the software.

You can easily feel the extra power the hybrid brings when you demand full acceleration. This hybrid can move out in a hurry and we think it could easily reach 60 mph in under seven seconds, or about a half second faster than the RX350. One thing that does not move faster is the fuel gauge. If you drive careful you can reach 30 mpg on the highway and more in town. Realistically, figure 25 to 26 in mixed driving. The RX 350 returns a real world 22 to 23 miles per gallon. Both cars can go well over 400 miles on a tank of unleaded. You should note that hybrids have additional maintenance costs and that the battery packs, which have a lengthy warranty, can cost several thousand dollars to replace.

RX 350

I am not a huge fan of SUVs because of their handling, gas hoggish nature, and visibility concerns on the side and back. The RX sisters are no exceptions, but Lexus has compensated for these conditions by an outstanding array of safety and performance features. It is no wonder they have such high safety ratings. Both cars ride as well as some luxury sedans over highways and certainly much better than such gas hogs as the Bentley Continental. Be warned, though, that this is not a nimble vehicle and the steering can feel slow to react when the road requires frequent corrections. Visibility to the side is excellent with the best mirrors in the SUV business. It is clear that the Lexus engineers designed this for more cruising than bruising, even though the 7.1 inch ride height is adequate and the all wheel drive system with the electric motors very peppy on inclines.

Braking is quite impressive with very little front dip, but we would strongly recommend you don’t overestimate the stopping distance because this is a two-ton vehicle when loaded. On the RX 450h the braking process helps regenerate the battery pack and thus the brakes feel is a tad bit harsh, but it is easy to master. The attention to detail, ability to park in tight places, power, and notable quality and features are unmatched. Add to that its high resale, award winning customer service, and the only decision is to justify the cost of the hybrid version. Personally, it is the one to own if nothing else for its performance.

Young working woman’s view: What can you say to a queen who has everything? There is little to add here. I didn’t like the way the fuel light went on with so little fanfare, I thought that the alloy rims were unworthy and needed to be rethought as they are just not right, and I would have preferred if the power tailgate would open with less fanfare as it sounds like a truck is backing up. Starting the hybrid is eerie to say the least. You turn on the ignition; wait for the light in the gauge cluster to read “Ready,” and you just touch the accelerator. No fuss, no muss, and if you are careful you can even drive several miles without using the gas engine at all.

Both RX models have significant safety features that include front side airbags, head-protecting curtain side airbags and a driver knee airbag. A control system that uses the Electronically Controlled Brake system with Anti-Lock Brakes and Electronic Brake force Distribution creates a Vehicle Dynamics Integrated Management system to help prevent the vehicle from becoming unstable. In other words, this queen has built a sturdy safety castle around her charges. Although the RX is based on a Camry platform, it is definitely off-roadable. However, who would want to take one of these into the boondocks and scratch that deep paint ironically on the same vegetation that these hybrids were born to protect.

There are a lot of look alike buttons in the center of the dash that must be learned because reading them is difficult in bright sunlight. The GPS monitor is large and the joy stick that controls the many features of the loaded RX 450 h didn’t take long to master. The bottom line is that this is not the car for me based on its pricing and features. Although I appreciate the luxury and the fuel consumption, the Lexus IS series is trimmer, easier to maneuver, and more my style for less money. There is a Lexus CT 200h that costs less and gets is pretty cool looking in a different way that returns close to 40 mpg that is also appealing.

Young working male’s view: The back seats were very comfortable with handy cupholders, ample headroom, and foot space. Make sure you adjust the rear backrests before you get into the RX because they are really hard to adjust when you are sitting in them. You can fold the rear seats down in three sections, but they don’t fold real flat. You also have extra storage space in the rear cargo area on both sides and under the cover. And, there is a standard 115-volt 2-prong outlet to plug in that new computer. I like the http://www.eracks.com models with open software feature. Works well in the Lexus and is quiet, too.

The Lexus optional sound system is well worth investigating. You might just want to check it out listening to my latest songs at http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/simplethoughts What really interested me was how Lexus engineers were able to organize all the features using a very user friendly operating system. If you have the need for more seats, the Toyota Highlander hybrid may be a consideration as it has three rows of seating. The bottom line for me is that the hybrid only makes sense if you spend a considerable time in town. Otherwise, get the base RX and enjoy the ride.

Family conference: Call it a tall station wagon, try to humiliate it by claiming its an overpriced Toyota, make fun of its turtle shell appearance, or just point out you can get an SUV the same size and power for $10,000 less and you still are not going to convince buyers that this isn’t the cat’s meow of luxury SUVs. While the Acura MDX handles a bit better, the BMW is faster, and Mercedes more off roadable, and the Infiniti sportier, the Lexus is all alone when it comes to providing buyers with what the majority want, and that is a luxury vehicle that is both practical an elegant and the 450 h is the queen. Long live the queen.

For the websites of all vehicle and motorcycle manufacturers go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/auto/index.html

by The Car Family

for more reviews go to http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

What recession?

There is no sign of it in the Los Angeles Convention Center as mainline manufacturers went all out with new car introductions and presentations. Even smaller companies such as Coda and its all electric sedans joined the joyous outing.

Youth was the overall theme with the audience filled with younger journalist and the appeal of the displays also favored the glamor of the new wave up buyers. For the first time in a decade there were female models in abundance and they even took over at some presentations as spokespersons. We are talking a sea change in the automotive industry and as for the nay sayers and Fox watchers, pooh on you because the look was all positive and upbeat.

Becoming crystal clear is Ford’s calling out of Toyota and may be winning that battle. The new Tauraus is just as good as the Avalon and more pleasing to drive. In the wings for Ford is a Prius fighter that should be available next year and the Fiesta and Focus are crawling over Corolla’s turf with more appeal to younger buyers. The Camry and Ford’s Fusion are conquerable in every way. And now the Ford Explorer is after Toyota’s CR-V in a big way. Both companies are fighting over the same turf with these latter two vehicles being redesigned for this year. However, Toyota continues to be more fuel efficient and Ford offering better pricing. At least for now. Toyota has already cut the price of several of its vehicles. If Ford can continue to improve its quality control it could be a major concern for Toyota.

In the meantime, the Los Angeles shows was full of gas guzzlers, It appears that 500 plus horsepower vehicles are as appealing to 40 mpg figures for those into conspicuous consumption. Off setting those fiendish fuel thirsty products was an equal number of hybrids, electric only, and even fuel cell powered vehicles.

Best at the Show

Our favorite was the two wheeled product constructed when AMG joined with Ducati to create a sensational motorcycle rocketship that not only flattens the pocketbook, with an estimated price of nearly $30,000, but offers the fortunate owner the ability to put this new creation in either the garage or an art museum.

Here are some other tidbits to tantalize those with good credit and understanding spouse.

The Chevrolet Camaro XL1 has 550-horsepower from its 6.2-liter engine and its a convertible, too. Of course, Ford has a Shelby GT 500 with even more horsepower that will be destroying egos and pavement soon. 

In a more family oriented vein, the Honda CR-V finally looks like it has entered the 21^st Century with a more artistic snout and slimmer hips. It better be, because the car of the show was the Ford Escape. This was easily the best vehicle at the show for those who wanted practicality in their garage. It loses it hybrid option, but gets more cargo space and a variety of fuel efficient engines starting with the 168-horsepower, 2.5-liter four-cylinder and engine with turbocharged V6 versions. This will be a homerun for Ford. On the other hand the Lincoln MKT and MKS received a few needed suspension updates and a more trendy grill.

Fiat finally brought the 500 Abarth version with a more Italianish interior a stiffer suspension and badly needed 160 horsepower engine. Cute, no doubt, but with an abundance of smaller attention getters the Fiat needs to offer something special and so maybe this version will prove tempting to the dare to be different crowd.

Small also was the theme for the Chevrolet Spark, but unlike the Fiat, this one is very basic and will toil as a low cost leader for the company. That doesn’t mean it is without spark, as a large touch screen, Bluetooth, and smart phone navigation are all available.

The Sonic C could make this brand name legendary with the sports car crowd who demand looks, performance, and gas mileage. Just a dream for now.

The very utilitarian and fun to drive Honda Fit will be offered on a lease bases in all electric form. You can go to the website and sign-up to be one of the first to plug these into your company’s unguarded outlet and get a free ride home.

Continuing its trend of more costs less, the Hyundai Azera is bigger, bolder, and faster. Well worth a look see if your ego can stand the fact that it rides, handles, and has more features than the more expensive competition, but doesn’t cost as much.

Infinti’s JX is a seven passenger crossover that takes a while to get used to as it isn’t the best looking in its class. However, it does have the best new feature of any car and that is automatic braking should the driver not see something in back of him or her. Seating for seven.

The Subaru BRZ is still a big tease. Looks sexy, but its not dating yet.

The CODA is an all electric, four door, five passenger sedan with the largest trunk in its class and the flexibility of 60/40 fold down rear seats. Every CODA comes with Alpine all-in-one audio, video and navigation system. Also standard, are Bluetooth, a touch screen, connections for iPhone, iPod and MP3 players, and a GreenScreen system that monitors driving efficiency and energy consumption.  With a powertrain that features 134 horsepower and 221 lb-ft of torque. More importantly, it is said to provide a range of up to 150 miles, and an average commute distance of up to 50 miles in two hours.

The last significant vehicle was Cadillac’s XTS 4 which looks like the CTS, but is larger and much better organized in terms of vehicle ergonomics. It will have 300 horsepower and a 3.6-liter V-6 engine.

Lowlights

Aston Martin One-77……..only 77 planned at over a million a copy. What happens when someone goes crazy with a French curve.

Words fail us, but apparently wagon wheels are back in style.

Always check the trunk size before you buy a vehicle. This Scion owner might just consider carrying Spare Tire in a Can.

Miata needs to realize that a bikini tops are for ladies, not sports cars.

For a list of all available websites go to:

http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

by The Car Family

For more reviews go to

http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

The new large Ford sedan shouldn’t really be called a Taurus because it is so totally different in every way. The fact that is is a much better looking, handling, and performing than the previous model also adds weight to our recommendation. To top off this dramatic change, the five passenger Taurus delivers excellent fuel economy and significant safety ratings while undercutting the price of some of the competition. In other words, forget the past, this is the Ford of the future as the company has left behind its legacy of stodgy vehicles. Indeed, only the slightly more fuel efficient Toyota Avalon can challenge it in the full size affordable family sedan field. And, we use the word affordability with caution because the Avalon breaches the $30,000 mark while the Ford can be nicely equipped for five grand less while offering more electronic options from communications to music.

Not to that the Avalon is a slouch. It is a great highway cruiser and holds the the edge in real world performance and utility. The Toyota comes in essentially one flavor with a 268 horsepower 3.5-liter V-6 engine mated to a six-speed automatic transmission. The Toyota’s fuel economy ratings is at the top of its class with 20/29 mpg. The Ford is nearly as powerful, but gets about a mile per gallon less. If you are feeling deprived the Taurus SHO model is turbocharged and produces 365 horsepower. We tested the standard model and averaged nearly 25 mpg in mixed driving. But what was more impressive with the Ford were the standard features. The base Taurus SE come with a six speaker stereo and CD player with MP3 playback and an auxiliary audio port, a fully adjustable steering wheel, alloy rims, and power locks, windows and mirrors. If you want more the SEL offers leather and satellite radio and a more sophisticated climate control system. You can also get a rearview camera, rear parking sensors, and the Sync electronics interface system with Bluetooth and an iPod interface.

In real world driving the Taurus is more eager to be frisky off the line, but the Avalon is more powerful when passing. Both vehicles have large fuel tanks that can easily make 400 mile trips without refueling.

The Ford design team gave the driver a high seating position and added a large trunk and also offered available all wheel drive. In other words, this sedan is as close in feeling to driving a SUV as they could make it. This is a trend for most larger sedans, however, it does create some headroom issues for those who are long waisted and drive these four doors equipped with a sun or moon roof.

In terms of interior room the Toyota does not sacrifice as much as the Ford do its exterior styling limitations. The Taurus rear passenger space has more restricted head and leg room. You can also order the Avalon with seating for six by offering a bench front seat.

Family conference: In reality, the Toyota Avalon has stayed remarkably consistent as a larger version of the Camry. Today, the performance, handling, and interior room are still the same high quality, but the completion from Ford, Buick, Kia, Hyundai, Chrysler, and Chevrolet have been nipping at its heels. The result is that the Avalon is a superior family sedan that can hold six in comfort and offer a sedate ride with admirable fuel mileage. The Ford is more modern in looks and has more updated options. It is not as roomy inside, but the trunk is huge. It does have restricted vision to the back and sides, but offers drivers a more involving feel. Both are at the top of the large family sedan class.

For a list of all vehicle websites go to:

http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

by The Car Family

for more reviews go to http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/

 In an age when conspicuous consumption seems to be an art, along comes two gloriously expensive sedans that do their best to be inconspicuous. The Lexus LS 600hL and the BMW ActiveHybrid 7 Series and a strange brew of technology, luxury, and performance, with just a touch of frugality thrown in to attract the green set.

We drove them both and they are remarkable in every technological way, and fast, but they are pushing the limits of driver patience with an endless array of buttons and settings. You can forget the simple temperature control knob or push buttons to select a radio station. These hybrids are multi-tasking machines that not only talk to you, but scold you as well. Leaving your lane, they’ll let you know. If there is a car in your blind spot they’ll flash you a sign, and in the case of the BMW, they will even make sure the door is snug. My advise is not to leave the dealership without a tutorial.

The good news is that they are quiet, fast and the gas mileage isn’t that bad considering these are hefty sedans. We averaged around 22 mpg with both vehicles, but be warned it is down right difficult to avoid unleasing the combination gas-electric forces under the hood, ah, trunk, ah, whatever. Indeed, the BMW is one of the fastest cars on the planet once it gets moving, and we mean moving. If your kids won’t quiet down, just floor this sedan and the g forces should pretty much leave them breathless until the police pull you over and ask for your pilot’s license. This BMW can reach 60 mph in well under five seconds and it probably won’t take much longer to reach orbit. The Lexus is slower, but not by much.

 We didn’t have a favorite. The BMW was the most fun, no doubt. But the complicated electronics kept us from enjoying its exemplary handling, stopping, and acceleration traits. The Lexus was smooth, quiet, and, well, a bit boring. In either case, the 22 gallon fuel tanks made 400 mile trips a possibility and with all the electronics to play with it is always entertaining.

 Mom’s view: I love the BMW 3 Series. Quick, responsive, and fuel efficent. The Seven Series hybrid has some of the same DNQ with excellent stopping power and handling, but that’s it outside of the look of the grill. The ActiveHybrid It is much smother and just as fast as the sexier looking supercharged Jaguar and, surprisingly, the interior is as nice as the British sedan. The Lexus has the better look for me, as the fit and finish were exceptional. It isn’t any secret that Lexus frequently finishes at the top of the consumer quality reports.

 Cost wise, they both are around $105,000. For that BMW gives you a combination of lithium ion batteries, turbocharging, and a 4.4-liter engine that yield 455 horsepower. The Lexus uses its hybrid with a larger, non-turbocharged, 5-liter V8 engine in combination and two electric motors to provide 430 horsepower.

 Driving the Lexus is easier. Both have engines that shut down when the car is stopped, but the Lexus is much more seamless when it comes time to starting. The cars have fairly good views in all directions and the seats are so adjustable that finding a fanny friendly position isn’t difficult. Of course these expensive sedans have steering wheels that power adjustments for those of us with short torsos and shorter arms and have to share with longer-legged relatives. The trunk space on the BMW does not give up as much room for the extra batteries that drive the hybrid as the Lexus. I liked the Lexus better. It was less fussy and plenty fast. Besides, for the MSRP I want to be coddled.

 Dad’s view: The BMW has an eight speed automatic transmission while the Lexus as a continuous variable unit that makes constant adjustments to maximize performance and efficiency. The Lexus is smoother. The BMW does offer a sportier suspension and that includes a self-leveling rear suspension and all sorts of safety equipment such as Driving Dynamics Control, Dynamic Stability Control, and Servotronic steering assist. Overall, I just liked driving the BMW better. The Lexus was more comfortable, easier to master, and to park. But it had no spark. The bottom line is that this a lot of money to be green.

Young working woman’s view: These are very big sedans. The turning radius for the BMW is over 42 feet, and the Lexus does it in 40. In other words, if you are looking for a parking space in a crowded mall prepare to spend time docking. Rear and front seat head and leg room is spacious in both cars, but the Lexus only has ten cubic feet of trunk space as the hybrid batteries take up a lot of room. The BMW has 14 cu.ft.

The Lexus dash is easier to navigate and the instrument panel continues to be exemplary. The cars have readouts for everything from tire pressure to gas mileage for the last few minutes. I really liked the extra cost feature that tells you when there is a slow traffic ahead and how many miles it lasts. The BMW has its owners manual located in the hard drive so you can read it using the car’s monitor. This is an interesting development. Not to be outdone, the Hyundai Equus goes one better by placing an iPad 2 in the glove compartment with the information on a file. The Lexus uses the old fashioned Lexus Library type of owner’s manual with several hundred pages of information. Somehow, I prefer this and I am supposed to be technological inclined.

Both vehicles are technological showcases with LED projector headlights, keyless ignition and entry, power door closers, parking assist with a back-up camera, a hard-drive-based navigation system, high-output stereo systems, and the Lexus will even park itself. Be warned that you are going to have to get out of that parking place on your own. The BMW is a tad longer, but weighs less. They both have whopping gas tanks that hold about 22 gallons of fuel. In other words, 400 mile trips are non-stoppers if you want to challenge your kidneys. I don’t have a choice between these two. Neither appealed to my sense of treading softly on the Earth and both were too big and too conspicuous. I would much prefer the Lexus RX hybrid, which we have tested, or the frisky BMW 3 Series to place under my covered parking space.

Family conference: The choice between these two is essentially based on how you drive. If you are into performance go with the BMW, if you want luxury and quiet pay the Lexus dealer. If you have children the BMW’s larger trunk will be of significant value.

For a list of all vehicle websites go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/auto/index.html

 I checked around the country with several builders of these types of vehicles and there was no doubt that the price was justified.  Freeway legal, eager to please, and agile, this bike real attraction is in its lines. Perhaps the future will be less about cartoonish OC styled thumpers and more about the beauty of more is less….Understated Elegance. We’ll buy it.

http://www.lossaengineering.com/2011/08/16/poco-bastrado-replicas-for-sale/

Jay LaRossa is the owner and builder and his work has been featured on the television series, Cafe Racer, as well as many periodicals. 

Lossa Engineering, 2659 Junipero Ave., Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562)889-8389 

 by Alan Haskvitz

Voted 100 Most Important Educators in the World

for more resources go tohttp://www.reacheverychild.com

 From Time Magazine:

What my students did on 9/11

http://www.time.com/time/2003/kids/crisis.html

 9/11 Commemorations and Information

http://www.usa.gov/Citizen/Topics/History_American/September11.shtml

Videos about 9/11

http://www.watchknowlearn.org/SearchResults.aspx?SearchText=9/11

Teaching about Patriotism

http://www.reacheverychild.com/feature/patriotic.html

 A large link site with lessons and more

http://www.textweek.com/anniversary.htm

 4Action

A free teaching booklet

https://sites.google.com/site/the4actioninitiative/

 The best sites to teach about 9/11

http://larryferlazzo.edublogs.org/2008/08/13/the-best-sites-to-help-teach-about-911/

 9/11 Memorial Site

Photos and information

http://www.911memorial.org/

 Lessons about terrorism

These are on terrorism.

http://www.educationworld.com/a_lesson/lesson244.shtml

 Links and a poem

http://www.vickiblackwell.com/sept11.html

The Seven Habits of Highly Ineffective Terrorits

For older students

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/10/the_seven_habit.html

Time Magazine Photos

http://www.life.com/gallery/59971/911-the-25-most-powerful-photos?xid=newsletter#index/0

by The Car Family

for more reviews go to http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/

Even after spending weeks in these two vehicles it isn’t easy to tell you which one is best because there isn’t a best. It just depends. If you travel 50 miles or less on a regular basis the Volt is the one to own. It is a great drive and comfortable at speed. If you travel 12 miles of less the Prius is the one to own. The difference is what happens after you travel your electric-only distance in each car. At that time the Chevrolet Volt’s engine returns 34 mpg while the Prius tops 50 with ease. As for cost, the Volt is priced around $40,000 and Toyota has yet to price its plug-in version of the Prius. Regardless, it will come in under the Chevrolet due to the fact that uses many of the same parts as the existing Prius while Chevrolet’s Volt is new and uses far more expensive batteries to achieve its longer electric-only mileage.

Just in, the plug in version will be priced from $32,000 to nearly $40, depending on the amount of electronic goodies you want. Look for better range for the added battery pack and the government has an incentive that could take off a couple of grand from the total.  Meanwhile. Chevrolet has lowered the price of the Volt.

In our case, the Prius is the better fit and with the new models said to have the ability to control when that 13 miles of electric only extra battery pack will come into use it makes it even more desirable. Why? Because when you are at freeway speeds that Prius gives you 50 miles per gallon and when you hit traffic you simple hit the electric power only button and you aren’t going to use any fuel for over ten miles. Indeed, on our recent 200 mile venture the Prius gave us 62.3 mpg. The Volt does not have that feature, but does offer superior interior design and better highway ride.

Driving each vehicle is easy and hassle free. At night, when electric rates go down, you plug them into a 110 outlet. It takes three hours for the Prius and about eight or nine for the Volt as it has a far larger battery pack. Both cars have the ability to charge more quickly with a special 220/240 volt outlet connection.

If you like to drive fast the Volt is very responsive and highly underrated as a handling car. The weight of the large battery pack that sits low in the frame makes cornering a breeze. The Prius has its extra battery pack in the area below the rear hatch. This location means that the car does not have a spare tire. We would buy a space saver and sacrifice the trunk space if we were traveling away from services. The Prius and Volt both brake well and you hardly notice when the gas engines turn start. The Volt is the better performer overall. However, when you hit the power button on the Prius you are going to find yourself pleased with the added acceleration. It can become addicting.

There is one variable here that needs to be addressed and that is whether or not the extra cost of the additional battery pack in the Prius is going to be worth the few extra miles per gallon over the standard Prius. After all, the plug in version only gets you a few extra miles of electric only travel and it may costs several thousand dollars more. In our case it would be worth the extra. If we remembered to plug it in after six when the electric rates were lower and unplug it three hours later we would not have to buy any gas for months. This did not prove a problem for us.  We also didn’t have to worry about range anxiety in either of thee vehicles because if you want to take a longer trip the gas engines fire up. Finally, there is another consideration and that is the fact the Volt is made in America and the Prius in Japan. We are not being xenophobic here, but with the recent nuclear power plant problems in Japan and its impact on both parts and vehicles one might consider availability for granted. On the other hand, we have noted a few Chevrolet dealers were asking a premium price for the Volt.

Mom’s view: The Volt is a better family sedan. It is easier to get in and out of and has the features that we have been accustomed to over the years such as more passing power and passenger comfort. That being said, I like the maneuverability of the Prius more, although it takes a longer time to get used to its handling and braking characteristics whereas the Volt felt more handy. I would note here, that if you drive more than 50 miles a day and take frequent long trips the Chevrolet Cruze may be a better choice. It is a refined sedan with a huge trunk, priced at half of the Volt’s cost, and gets 40 miles per gallon on the highway. I found the Cruze the best compact car Chevrolet has ever built and well worth a test drive.

Chevrolet's new Cruze

In terms of design, the Volt is a winner, Everything is very well thought out with easy to read gauges and comfortable seating. The Prius is more basic. The rear seats offer less room and there is less useful cargo space. The dash layouts on both are simple, but the Prius offers more information once you learn to manipulate the screen buttons. Neither car has a good GPS with the Toyota locking you out when the car is in motion and the Volt’s being difficult to navigate. The Volt also has a center stack that is difficult to read and requires a longer learning curve.

Safety wise the Prius has driver and front passenger Advanced Airbag System, driver and front passenger seat-mounted side airbags, driver knee airbags and front and rear side curtain airbags. Toyota’s Star Safety System features Enhanced Vehicle Stability Control, Traction Control, Anti-lock Brakes with Electronic Brake-force Distribution and Brake Assist. Crash tests for the regular model have been good. Since we were testing a prototype we can only surmise that the same scores would apply to the 2012 version. We always recommend ordering all the extra safety equipment which includes a Pre-collision System and Lane Keep Assist. The Volt gets nearly identical crash scores and such features as a StabiliTrak electronic stability control system, front, side, and knee air bags in addition to a roof-mounted head-curtain air bags. Our test Volt had the optional rearview camera and it worked well. Overall, I liked the Volt best except for the center stack and visibility concerns.

Dad’s view: So alike and yet so different, these two plug-in sedans are the future for those who can abide by their restrictions. For example, batteries don’t do well in extreme cold weather and there isn’t a lot of cargo room in these two. But for the majority of people, they are a perfect fit. Research has shown that the average commute is 16 miles. Now that means that half of the people travel less, which would make the Prius an excellent fit. And for the other half, the Volt would be ideal. Add to that the fact that many commutes are in heavy traffic. In that case, both are ideal because the engines shut down when traffic is stopped.

Engine wise, the Prius has a 1.8 liter engine that easily produces 98 horsepower and with the regular battery pack you can expect even more power, especially since the electric motors offer immediate torque. The Chevrolet Volt has a smaller engine with is its 1.4 liter seeking premium fuel, and with help from the battery powered motors provides a similar thrust, but with less engine noise. The Volt feels faster and reacts quicker to inputs. Advantage here to the Volt. As for my choice, I would go with Prius for two reasons. It is well proven and will undoubtably cost less.

Young working woman’s view: Of note is the recharge time for these two. Since the Volt has a larger battery pack it uses more household electricity. You do go further with that charge, but it takes longer. Special fast charging stations that use a 220/240-volt set-up are going to cost you a reported $2000 more. To me that isn’t worth it. However, if I had such a devise at work and could plug in my hybrid there it would be a real plus. The battery packs are said to last for at least a decade, but that really does not seem to be an issue as many Prius models have never had a battery failure in hundreds of thousands of miles.

For appeal it is all Volt. It comes standard with a lot of features such as 17-inch alloy wheels, automatic headlights, heated mirrors, remote ignition, cruise control, auto-dimming rearview mirror, Bluetooth, a limited free OnStar subscription, a touchscreen navigation system, voice controls and a six-speaker Bose stereo with CD/DVD player, audio jack, iPod/USB interface and more. There is also a Premium Trim package and The Rear Camera and Park Assist package adds a rearview camera and front and rear parking sensors. I recommend the latter as the visibility outside the Volt is more restricted than the Prius. So Volt is the winner for me even though I much prefer the maneuverability of the Prius. It is just more trendy and up to date.

Young working male’s view: The Prius PHV is interesting in that you need to control your demand for forward thrust or else the gasoline engine fires up. I learned to feather the throttle is for no other reason than to avoid listening to the groan of the 1.8 engine. The Volt also has an exhaust note that isn’t very pleasing, but you don’t have to be so gentle with the accelerator pedal. The reason that some people complain about getting gas mileage in the 40s with the Prius is that they drive it like a gasoline or diesel only powered vehicle. These vehicles require a different driving style. Momentum is everything and taking advantage of there high mileage tires and the vehicles low rolling resistance is a must. You can easily pick-up speed going down the smallest incline in these sedans without having to use an throttle input. In mountain driving both cars have a lower gear to use to help slow the vehicle as they can pick up speed quickly on steep grades.

I had a difficult time trying to tell the Prius PHV from the its trimmer, unplugged sister. The only clue was the cutout in the left front fender that houses the electric input adapter. There were extensive decals annoucning that this was the new plug in, but basically that was it. I was somewhat concerned that the small door that covers the Toyota’s plug in connection does not lock with the central locking system. The Volt’s does. The Prius and the Volt both come with a kit that enables you to plug it into any 110 outlet. Toyota provides 22 feet of cord and be well warned that you must not use any other extension. The same goes for the Volt. I felt that Toyota should have followed the Volt in having the Prius receptacle lighted for night use. I also thought that the Volt had a better system of tracking the time left for a complete charge. It should be noted that we were in a prototype and that Toyota retail version will surely have many tweaks that will make it more user friendly.

The PHV’s cargo floor is a bit higher than in the regular Prius to allow for the added battery pack. The Prius PHV battery pack is a potent lithium-ion pack. Since I work making open software computers and servers at http://www.eracks.com I am familiar with these and find them reliable. The Prius uses a parallel-hybrid powertrain that is seamless and when you use the power button, almost frisky. I did say , almost. The 15-inch wheels are not nearly as nice as the Volt’s and the brakes and steering are vague and unfeeling. For my use the Volt would be the choice. Sexier and not so bland.

Family conference: No clear winner, but the one the fits our needs best is the Prius. The plug in model should be ready by 2012 and we have placed our name on the waiting list. Why? Simple, it is going to have a proven track record of reliability, high resale, and fits our driving needs. We dearly loved the Volt, but the pricing and fuel mileage once the batteries are depleted are a concern. If your daily driving needs are more aligned with the Volt it is worth the price, but if you drive further the Chevrolet Cruze is a strong consideration. The Cruze is our pick for the best of the compact gasoline powered vehicles at this time.

For a list of vehicle websites go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

by The Car Family

for more reviews go to http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/

for a list of vehicle manufacturers go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/auto/index.html

Chevrolet, General Motors’ price leading brand, has brought to the increasingly fuel efficiency conscious American consumer three vehicles that are impressive in their diversity and mpg ratings. The Chevrolet Volt, Equinox, and Cruze Eco have rushed to the top of the coveted gas mileage rating guides in dramatic fashion. What is especially appealing is that the each model shows that Chevrolet is moving closer to future in terms of providing family oriented vehicles with frugal family economy.

Chevrolet Volt

The vehicle attracting the most media attention is the Volt. It is a hybrid sedan that offers the versatility of a lithium-ion battery pack and a four-cylinder engine. We found that if you plug it in at night you can go 50 miles at highway speed before the gas engine takes up the challenge. Thus is is very difficult to provide mile per gallon information. If you don’t travel more than 50 miles per day and plug it in daily, you simple don’t need to use the gas engine. If you are only using the gas engine you get about 34 mpg. So the Volt is one vehicle where there really isn’t a miles per gallon rating that is accurate for everyone. The Volt costs slightly over $40,000 and that does not include the $7,500 federal tax credit. Add to that the fact that if you want a faster charge you need to buy a special unit that enables the batteries to get a bigger does of your electric bill. We figure it costs us about a dollar a day, but rates vary signifcantly. We doubt that if you travel 50 miles you are going to spend much more than a buck for the charge. Using the same yardstick, even with the very efficient Chevrolet Cruze, you would spend over four dollars at today’s fuel costs.

With seating for four, a lot of standard equipment including automatic climate control, cruise control, auto-dimming rearview mirror, a Bluetooth, OnStar, a navigation system with touchscreen, voice controls and real-time traffic, and a Bose stereo with CD/DVD player with auxiliary audio jack, iPod/USB capabilities there isn’t much more you need in the Volt. However, we always recommend the rear camera and park assist package as visibility to the back is hindered by the high trunk. The Volt also has a steeply raked front hood that makes it difficult to know how close you are to an obstruction in front and large A and B pillars that can compromise visibility to the sides. Safety wise you get ABS, stability control, front side and knee airbags and full-length side curtain airbags. Braking is good.

We like the Volt and its driveability. It was quick off the mark and kept pace with traffic with ease. The dash and readouts are easy to master, but the modernist layout takes a while to master, especially with the bright, white plastic that covered the center stack on our test vehicle.  The Volt comes with a cell phone application that enables you to work with the vehicle and more. The battery pack is placed low in the vehicle for better handling and when you raise the hood you are going to  know for certain that tinkering is not in the cards.

The electric motor and 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine work seamlessly and are the best we have tested. The engine does sound strained at times, but one look at the miles per gallon read-out is a balm for those occasions. However, the engine does seek premium fuel. The Volt holds four adults and, although the doors shut with a reassuring solid sound, there are signs that some sacrifices were made in the interest of a weight reduction with the lack of power seats and a maller back seat. The trunk is useful in size and the rear seats fold down to help when caring longer packages.

Handling is surprisingly good and the brakes don’t have that numb feel that some hybrids possess. In a nutshell, the Volt is a playful, practical, and pretty sedan and well worth a drive if you can afford the price and can benefit from its electric only range. If those attributes don’t meet your needs , climb aboard the Chevrolet Cruze Eco which provides 36 mpg in mixed driving and costs under $20,000.

Chevrolet Cruze Eco

Finally, a smaller Chevrolet that is downright zippy, gets excellent gas mileage, and has enough room for the average family. The problem is that the Eco, with its six speed manual transmission, is so frisky people are going to think you are just practical,when the reality is that the Eco is a hoot to drive. The inline-4 engine is perky, a bit playful, and quiet enough so that you have to train yourself to shift into its overdrive sixth gear because if feels and sounds so right in fifth.

There is an abundance of airbags front, side, knee and rear, and the Eco has stability and traction control, ABS, daytime running lights, OnStar, and more. Crash test scores are excellent. Chevrolet went all out on this model and it gives the competition a real run for money. And, if you order the Cruze with the larger engine it is even more invigorating. Of course the competition is significant especially with the new Hyundai Elantra and Ford Focus, but neither are as fun to drive. There are a plethoraof models and options in the Cruze catalog, but our Eco was probably the best choice with the connectivity and cruise package for $525.

The Eco’s turbocharged 1.4-liter inline-4 generates 138 horsepower and is good for slightly sub ten second runs to 60 mph. Initial acceleration really isn’t its forte. Itt comes alive when you need a little zip to pass. Just downshift a gear or two and let the turbocharger perk things up. Fuel economy ratings for the six speed model are 28 mpg city/42 mpg highway a couple of miles per gallon less with the automatic. If you commute a lot, the automatic is probably the better choice.

Interior design is modern and comfortable, but rear seat leg room is a bit tight, as it is for most cars in its class. The dash is covered in a material that isn’t easy to clean and the interior’s overall look is trim, not fancy. The trunk is very large and the entire car is larger on the inside than it looks from the outside. Easy to shift, fun to drive, and excellent fuel mileage make this a must test drive vehicle for those who feel that the Asian competitors build the best compacts. We think you are going to be surprised, and there are some great deals being made.

Chevrolet Equinox

We liked the early model Equinox better because it was smaller and more nimble. But this plus-sized new one isn’t that hard to love if you like practicality and are willing to live with its reduced visibility to the sides.

The good news here is that the Equinox and its standard 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine with 182 horsepower and 172 pound-feet of torque is powerful enough to handle most daily tasks in the front wheel drive model and delivers great economy. Moving to the 3.0-liter V6 and its 264 horsepower and six-speed automatic isn’t necessary, unless towing or with the all wheel drive option. There are several models from the basic LS to the upscale LTZ and all are well-equipped, with power front seat adjustments, a sliding and reclining backseat, and optional equipment extends from audio goodies to a power lift gate. However, third row seating is not offered. The Car Family feels that if you need seating for six or more on a regular basis a minivan is safer.

The range and fuel economy with the base engine is outstanding. We averaged over 26 mpg in mixed driving and the driving range before refueling can reach well into the 400 miles category. The EPA gives the Equinox a top notch 32-mpg EPA highway rating.

A nice feature of the Equinox are large side view mirrors, which as very handy as visibility to the sides is restricted due to the large A and B pillars. There is ample room inside and the seats are fairly comfortable. The cargo space, center console are quite spacious and the various storage bins are numerous.

The ride is what you would expect of a SUV and the acceleration acceptable. But what sets the Equinox apart is its combination of economy, room, and attention to details such as the ability to program the height the power tailgate reaches. This makes it ideal for shorter owners. Overall, a well thought out SUV that provides good family values.

Family conference: If it doesn’t kill you it makes you stronger and General Motors recent battle with bankruptcy has indeed resulted in some better models. No longer lingering are the Bob Lutz Hummer H2 and the stink of ignoring the American buyer’s interest. These three are all worth a long look and, perhaps, a return to the USA for family vehicle buyers.

by Alan Haskvitz

Author of Sorry I Am a Teacher

http://teachers.net/gazette/wordpress/alan-haskvitz/im-sorry-i-am-a-teacher/

These sites include everything from tutorials to copyright laws to grants. Each one has its own personality so you may want to take your time with them.

How Teachers Learn Technology Best

http://fno.org/mar01/howlearn.html

Technology Grants

http://www.reacheverychild.com/feature/grants.html

Important Laws and Ideas about Using Technology in the Classroom

http://www.reacheverychild.com/feature/classroom-technology.html

Massive Link site

http://www.reacheverychild.com/feature/tech_day.html

Technology Organizations and Companies

http://www.reacheverychild.com/computers/technology/index.html

Woopid

Free video tutorials

http://www.woopid.com/

Explania

Hundreds of animated explanations, interactive tutorials and instructional videos.

http://www.explania.com/en

Technology Tutorials

Over most najor software

http://www.internet4classrooms.com/on-line2.htm

Top 100 Technology Blogs

http://www.onlinedegrees.org/top-100-technology-blogs-for-teachers/

A website dedicated to educational technology

http://www.edtechteacher.org/

Teacher Technology Resources

http://genoaschools.net/staff/pscline/Teacher%20Technology%20Resources.htm

Free Technology for Teachers

http://www.freetech4teachers.com/

http://www.reacheverychild.com

http://www.watchknow.org

Love them or hate them they are here and for some teachers in English and mathematics it looks like some adjustments may need to be made to existing curriculum. Here are the sites with information on these new standards:

Adoptions by States and more
This is the host site for the Standards.

http://www.corestandards.org/

This is an editorial questioning the Standards

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/guest-bloggers/are-common-core-standards-real.html

This is another editorial picking questioning the research and purpose of Common Core Standards

http://susanohanian.org/show_commentaries.php?id=879

An Editorial favoring the Standards

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/243517/common-core-curriculum-chester-e-finn-jr

Common Core Curriculum Maps

http://www.commoncore.org/

AND

http://www.aasa.org/content.aspx?id=16226

Common Core Updates
The latest information is said to be posted on this site.

http://www.edinformatics.com/curriculum/common_core_standards.htm

Potential concerns about Common Core Lessons

http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2010/08/20/01curriculum_ep.h30.html?tkn=NSYFpfPJXKWErVNR14GyBPhTiYbpoZa3Ea8g&cmp=clp-edweek

Contact Common Core

http://www.commoncore.org/contactus.php

Samples of a math and science formative assessment literacy cards

http://www.gatesfoundation.org/learning/Pages/2010-supporting-instruction.aspx

Large link site and explanation

http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/teachers/standards.html

Sample High School Calendar based on Common Core English Standards

http://memorial.tulsaschools.org/staff_directory/language_arts/baker__sommer/english_i_lesson_plans/

Common Core FAQ

http://www.corestandards.org/frequently-asked-questions