Box Cars: Perfect for Hauling Coal for Stockings

by The Car Family

For more reviews: http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

Looking for the best vehicle to haul that coal for the undeserving one’s stocking this holiday season? Well it might not be that simple since there are five main types of coal. Of these, Anthracite, which is an environmentalist nightmare, has significant carbon content, but high heating value. Bituminous, the most common, is used mainly for generating electricity and casts a large carbon footprint, too. There is also Subbituminous, which gives less heat, but also has less carbon, and Lignite, a younger coal with less potential.

So which coal to buy is the question, but equally of note is which box car to tote home the combustible sedimentary rock? Fortunately, this holiday season there are three fairly newly minted vehicles that provide good fuel mileage, room for four adults as well as a few bags of coal within their squared off exteriors. The box cars are the Scion xB the Kia Soul, and the Nissan Cube and they are as different as Bituminous is from Lignite despite their similar Lego-like looks.

Mom’s view: The most conservative of the trio is the fairly “spacious” Scion xB with nearly 70 cubic feet of interior space and a lengthy list of options from stereo upgrades to an integrated navigation system. There is an abundance of standard features, especially considering the mid-$15,000 price range. Acceleration is PCH brisk, which means it can get you to 40 mph in a hurry, but after that no rush. The engine is eager to please while still yielding above 30 mpg in mixed driving. The interior is quaint, but legroom is tight. Safety features include antilock brakes with brake assist, traction control, front seat side airbags, full-length side curtain airbags and front active head restraints. Crash scores have been above average. Overall, this is a handy rig, but the bus driver type seat and steering wheel angle were obviously designed for a younger dudette.

Dad’s view: If you are into a bit more sport and a whole lot more fun the Kia Soul is worth a tug at your purse strings. Starting under $14,000, this cool coal hauler has a great seating position, good handling, although it can be harsh on tax deprived roads, and offers 53 cubic feet of cargo space or about room for 40 bushels. Besides its looks, the Soul has such standard features as a four-speaker stereo with CD/MP3 player, satellite radio, and auxiliary input jacks, as well as 12-volt power outlets. An enormous number of options can help give the Soul more soul, but definitely check out the glowing upholstery options and get the larger engine. The base engine and local canyons don’t make a good mix. Safety features include antilock brakes. stability control and front side airbags and side curtain airbags. A bit noisy, but with the excellent stereo it really doesn’t matter. Overall, a worthy utility machine that is loaded with value. However, a safety reminder is in order. Never, ever start the Soul after a member of the younger generation has driven it without first turning off the stereo first. You heard me, didn’t you?

Young guilty male driver’s view: Priced around $15,000, the Nissan Cube is an oxymoron, a round box. Every inch of this vessel has been exposed to the French curve and the result is, well, French like. Perhaps this is owing to the fact that Renault has controlling shares. Nevertheless, this is a compelling machine and practical, too. It has just over 58 cubic feet of cargo space and the rear hatch can be accessed through the side-hinged door. The interior is interesting, especially with the optional 20-color interior lighting and distinctive instrument panel. The easiest to park and maneuver, the Cube is full of fascinating features and doesn’t short change the buyer on safety equipment as front-seat side airbags, full-length side curtain airbags, stability control and antilock brakes are standard. Cool, but the stereo is n’t as sick as the Soul.

Family conference: All of these diamonds in the rough are great coal haulers, but after the season is over they are also ideal for driving the kids to the therapist and still have room in back for the peace making dog in the process. And if you are into positive reinforcement and don’t cater to the Sicilian tradition of coal in the stocking, or perhaps want to substitute Carbone Dolce, these three boxcars are great fun and attract more attention than a Maria Shriver with a cell phone.

For a list of all vehicle websites go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

  Mazda CX-7: Fresh Face Makes an Impression

 by The Car Family

for more reviews go to

 Stepping to the front of the mid-size crossover line in the under $25,000 category isn’t easy in a class that has proven winners from Toyota, Ford, Honda, Nissan, Volkswagen, and Subaru. Indeed, we were quite skeptical, but that is what Mazda has done with its CX-7. Of course, that does not mean that this Mazda is the best for everyone as it clearly favors those who like a more compact SUV that handles well, gets excellent fuel mileage, and can live with possible subpar resale. We could accept these and we also think that Mazda’s reliability index is going to improve as we could find nothing remotely wrong with our test vehicle after a week of significant driving in all types of conditions.

 Mom’s view: When I got out of the CX-7 After two hours of driving this sporty Mazda I was not stiff and was quite pleased with its features. It is attractive inside and out, and except for the dam, and I mean dam, speedometer it was a joy. The problem with the speedometer is that it has fonts that are way to small and the 80 mph and 60 mph readings are too close together. Why does a SUV like this need a speedometer that goes to 140 is beyond me.

Getting in and out is easy and the rear doors open wide to accommodate even larger adults. There isn’t much cargo space, which is a weakness, but its base price of $22,340 makes up for it. Of course, it is still priced a bit higher than the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV-4, both of which have more useful interior space.

 Safety wise the Mazda has done well on federal crash tests with side curtain air bags, ABS, and electronic stability control. On the negative end is the reduced rear visibility and I would highly recommend the rear view camera, even though the dash mounted monitor is small and the image sometimes cloudy. The high seating position was also welcomed on crowded highways.

The interior is lively, and this Mazda has 60/40-split folding rear seats that can easily be lowered using a handle in the cargo bay.

Another plus is that the rear seats can be folded flat without having to remove the headrests. Our test vehicle had a few touches of chrome with the optional beige leather surfaces which was okay, but the dashboard was quite modern looking and the easy to grip steering wheel with its abundance of controls for the sound system, cruise control, Bluetooth, and more were well done and easy to master.

Dad’s view: Mazda’s CR-7 has a 2.5-liter, four-cylinder engine creating 161 horsepower, of which 90 percent is online at just 2,000 rpm, and providing the owner with about 24 mpg in mixed driving. It isn’t as quick as the optional turbocharged engine, but it is a lot easier to live with, especially if you reside in areas where it snows. You can order the Mazda as a Sport, Touring or Grand Touring. We had the Sport model with front wheel drive and it was a great combination of family hauler, daily commuter, and still had canyon running capabilities. The only competition we see for the Mazda is from Volkswagen and Acura and neither of these had the combination of price, sportiness, and gas mileage that we like, although the Volkswagen and Acura had excellent build quality that seemed unsure of how many gears to downshift on steep climbs. On the other hand it was very responsive to heavy accelerator inputs. The handling was exceptional, although the steering was a bit light. Unless you have a need for speed the base engine is plenty, but for a few thousand more you can order the the 244-hp turbocharged four cylinder version and challenge many more expensive crossovers. The Mazda CR-7 reminds me most of the Acura SUV in terms of handling and the Nissan Rouge for acceleration. The Subaru Forester has more room and all of these are priced almost identically and so exterior allure may be the deciding factor. All fo these vehicles come with all drive either as standard, or as the Mazda, as an option.

Young working woman’s view: Not the prettiest face and I am not sure about its reliability based on some mediocre consumer ratings, but it is easy to live with and has the charm and lovability those in my demographic group seem to admire. I do wish Mazda would prove a better warranty as the Mazda’s three-year/36,000-mile basic warranty isn’t attractive in this market outside of those with a more established reputation. I also found the rear seat a bit tight and the interior lighting was dim. The headlights were excellent and visibility in all directions except to the rear were excellent. I would order the optional rear view camera and the heated seats, too, although they push the cost up a $1700. The air and heat work fairly rapidly, but he huge windshield area is difficult takes a while to defog and defrost. Cleaning this large piece of expensive glass is also difficult both inside and out unless you are a NBA player.

 Young working male’s view: Superior radio reception with an easy to use system and lots of features that included the ability to pause the stereo. Well done. There is an abundance of standard items such as halogen headlights, a 6-way manual adjust driver’s seat, tilt and telescoping steering column, power doors and windows, air, and a plethora of safety details.

 However, I would recommend the optional Touring Technology Package with its Bose Centerpoint Surround Sound, nine speakers, six-disc CD/MP3 changer, moonroof, automatic climate control, and LCD screen with rear backup camera. I also recommend the quick acting heated seats. Speaking of which, I felt myself warming up to this Mazda the longer we drove it. The seats take a time to get correctly adjusted, but you don’t get tired on long trips. I would buy this SUV, and that is something I seldom say about a crossover or any SUV outside of a Lexus RX for that matter.

 Family conference: A superior effort from Mazda and one which should get more attention from those families who like a little sport in their daily delivery treks. For a list of all vehicle websites go to

 http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

Diesels Proving Good Bets for Family Transportation: BWM, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Audi.

By The Car Family

No question that the day of the large, gas hoggish, SUVs are over. With gas mileage that seldom ventured north of high teen marks and engines that polluted the atmosphere far in excess of other vehicles. That was then, this is now. Enter the refined diesel engine with their superior towing capacities, at least 20 percent better fuel mileage, less maintenance, and higher resale value.

Don’t confuse these new rigs with the smelly, smoky diesels of old. The new ones are clean burning and quiet. Add to that the fact that they are well proven, in Europe diesel powered vehicle sales make-up nearly half of all sales from such noted manufacturers as Mercedes and BMW, Audi, and Volkswagen. There are also government tax breaks up to $1300 on diesel vehicles. And there is something for every pocketbook in this category with pricing ranging from the low $20,000s to $60,000 and up.

So which diesel powered vehicle is best for the family? Well, it depends on your needs. To that end we evaluated a wide variety of them and each on was impressive and filled a need. We tested the BMW 335d, the Mercedes R, the Volkswagen Jetta TDI, and the Audi Q7. All of them were frisky, eager to please, and none of them gave anything less than 25 mpg. Our favorite was the Volkswagen TDI if for nothing else its price tax in the low $20,000 range. Next was the comfortable and spacious Mercedes. The BMW was the best handling, but the 27 mpg fuel mileage wasn’t what we expected and the sedan lacked family sized room for long trips. It was great fun to drive, though, and the engine was very powerful. It should be noted that the government has indicated that this BMW should have delivered 36 mpg on the highway so perhaps are driving style was responsible for the low figure. Of note is that the BMW also had a price tag of nearly $50,000. The Audi Q7 was a vast, sophisticated SUV that is loaded with features, but the fuel mileage is what is most impressive for this nearly three ton vehicle with 24 mpg or more possible on the highway. That is more than five miles per gallon better than the base six cylinder version and seven miles per gallon better than the V8 and both gas versions require premium fuel.

Buying a diesel pays off even if there is a premium price involved if you drive more than 15,000 miles a year. Not only is there fuel savings, but the maintenance is less due to the fact that a diesel does not have an ignition system that needs to be tended to. A diesel also has superior pulling power and the new models start well even in the colder climates. The reason that these diesels burn so cleanly is that a urea mixture is squirted into the exhaust system to clean the pollutants. The urea container needs to be replaced, but other than that the diesels are nearly mechanic proof as they don’t have a need for any spark plugs or other ignition parts save a glow plug that helps ignite the fuel to start the engine.

BMW 3 Series

BMW’s three series sedan is powered by a potent 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged diesel inline-6 that makes 265 horsepower and an enormous 425 lb-ft of torque that works through a six-speed automatic transmission. The seats are comfortable in front, but the rear seat is best left to smaller folk. The interior is bland and the trunk, at 12 cubic feet, small for such an expensive vehicle. Overall, this BMW is a terrific sporty diesel that clearly proves that a diesel can be fun to drive. It is very fast for a diesel and a delight to drive.

Mercedes R-Class

Next we tested the Mercedes -Benz R-Class with a 3.0-liter BlueTec diesel V-6 producing 210 horsepower and a he-man 398 lb.-ft. of torque. This MB reacts immediately to throttle input, albeit only until the tachometer reaches around 3000 rpm when the seven speed transmission shifts and allows the acceleration to continue to well above 100 mph, we are told. It is loaded with safety equipment that includes everything from airbags nearly everywhere, to warning devises, to traction, stability, and braking controls and more. Very safe.

The R Class is very long station wagon, indeed in length it dwarfs the hulking Hummer H2, but is much safer than that living example of why General Motors went bankrupt. The R Class is very family friendly with an abundance of room, even behind the third row of seats. However, this Mercedes does not have the easily removable middle row of seats.

We got 25 mpg in the Mercedes and it grew on us the longer we drove it. At first the R Class felt cold and stiff. But once we were able to sample it fare this vehicle easily is the best family transport for those who have a need for a classy workhorse. A true pleasure to drive and the diesel engine was as un-diesel as we have ever experienced. If it were not for the price of this vehicle it would have been our first choice. For example the rear seat backs recline, there are air vents for everyone, a low loading height, and cupholders galore. You can order the optional entertainment center, too, with LED screens behind the front headrests and each seatback monitor can show a different image from movies to video games to MP3 music.

The ride is very stable and it handles well, but what we especially liked was how easy it was to park in tight spots. Visibility to the sides is a bit tarnished by the wide panels and the rear doors are quite heavy and require a great deal of room to fully open. Outside of those few tarnishes, the R is a pleasure to drive to the corner store or on a long vacation trip. The one concern we had were the optional 19-inch tires that were just too noisy. They were very wide and this added to its handling, but took away from the fuel mileage.

This is an under-rated family vehicle with the unique ability to fit into most garages, venture out into inclement weather, and provides safety and great fuel mileage with at least 20 percent more travel from each gallon of diesel. And, on average, diesel is normally20 percent less expensive than the high octane fuel other big rigs require.

The most futuristic of all diesel vehicles, the R Class is a true utility vehicle for the future. And with the back two rows of seats folded flat you have a huge 85 cubic feet of space to bargain hunt with.

Volkswagen Jetta SportsWagon.

This is an example of a people mover with room for four adults, a 2.0-liter common rail turbocharged diesel engine that produces 140 horsepower and a 236 abaft of torque and surprisingly great handling. This is nearly as good of a handling vehicle as the twice as expensive BMW and gets well over 33 mpg in all types of driving. We recommend you don’t get the standard six-speed transmission as it simply does not pay either in better fuel mileage or drivability. Buy the automatic unit, which you can control with paddle shifters if you feel the need to exercise your decision making. Although the sedan Jetta is the better deal, the sedan is less expensive. We think the SportWagen is still worth the extra money and stick with the automatic transmission for smoother driving and better fuel mileage. The engine is certified to run on B5 biodiesel and is very responsive and goes well with its exceptional handling. Unlike the other vehicles tested, this one is front wheel drive.

The interior is rather bland with the seats having manual adjustments. The rear seats have a 60/40 split so you can haul longer items. Safety wise we highly recommend the optional rear air bags. The rear hatch is easy to open, but the rear doors are small and adults may have a problem getting in and out if they have large feet or long legs.

Overall, this is one very fun driver. The brakes are good, the suspension just right for a family wagon, and the engine supplies its torque at a low speed making cornering easy. While driving on a busy highway a tire exploded on the car ahead of me and I was quickly able to maneuver out of the way with the responsive steering. The government rates the Jetta at 41 highway and 30 in the city, but if you drive below the speed limit and do it smoothly, you can easily beat 50 mpg. All of this and the Jetta engine is rated as being the cleanest burning of the diesels. Of note, for those who want a more glamorous and expensive ride, the Audi A3 diesel is available with similar attributes.

Audi Q7

This all wheel giant is for those who desire a large SUV with the fuel mileage of a smaller SUV. Our recommendation is that unless you need the room; look at the smaller and more nimble Audi Q5. Audi’s stellar V6 TDI develops 221 horsepower and 406 pound-feet of torque from a low 1,750 rpm, and the acceleration continues to the redline of 4,500 rpm is reached. Acceleration is no problem for this 5000+ pounder. What is surprising is how quiet the big Audi is. Obviously, Audi has done a good job of soundproofing. The turbocharged engine can get you to 60 mpg in nine seconds and passing power is made simply thanks to a very cooperative six-speed automatic transmission.

Driving the Q7 you never forget you are driving a heavy vehicle as it feels ponderous at times. Add to that concern is the poor visibility to the sides and rear and you understand why you can order the Audi with its exceptional side warning lights and superior rear view monitor. Both are must haves. The tires are very large making getting in and out a bit of a trial, especially with the low ceiling height. This means you have to duck your head if you are over average height. We would go with smaller tires and sacrifice the added vehicle height for less road noise. The turning rate is good for mall parking, but it is way too large for making U turns and the like.

As all Audis, the interior is a study in quality. The seats, controls, gauges, and layout are all first class. The weakness is the multimedia interface that controls such features as heated seats and radio selections. It is easily mastered, but you need to take your eyes from the road for the most part.

Pricing is around the mid $50,000 range, but the rich options can drive that figure upwards of $60,000. As we stated, consider the smaller and less expensive Q5. The fuel tank holds over 25 gallons and with the 24 mpg we got in mixed non-stop trips over 500 miles are easily possible for those of you with cooperative kidneys.

Sharing its underpinnings with the less expensive Volkswagen Touareg and the trouble prone Porsche Cayenne reveals that the Audi has taken the middle passage with more luxury than the VW and the Porsche, but less sport than the competition. The VW should be considered an alternative if you don’t want Audi’s well proven all wheel drive system and the third row of seats.

Safety wise the Audi Q7 offers anti-lock four-wheel disc brakes with electronic brake-force distribution (EBD) and brake assist, Hill Descent Control, traction control, electronic stability, rollover sensing, dual front air bags, front side seat-mounted torso air bags, and side-curtain air bags for all rows. The best

that spans all three rows of seats. A tire-pressure monitor is also standard. Rear-seat side torso air bags are optional, as is the Audi Side Assist blind spot warning system

Family conference: Except for some chatter at low speeds these diesel powered vehicles were much better than their gas powered siblings in every way. Mom liked the long and futuristic looking Mercedes Benz R Class best due to its many safety features and extremely roomy interior. The fact it fit in the garage and performed flawlessly were nice, but the most compelling feature is the exterior. Dad loved the Volkswagen Jetta SportsWagen due to its handling and gas mileage. It is heavy on the sport and it is easy to maneuver and park. The young working woman went with the BMW because, well, it is a BMW. The young working male didn’t like any of them. Too big or too little. He did find the interior of the Audi the best and he was the only one able to quickly learn how to use the controls for te audio, no doubt due to his work at http://www.eracks.com making computers. Overall, the Jetta was our favorite for the smaller family and the Mercedes for the larger one. These vehicles are all worthy of consideration and certainly are proof that the diesel is not just for trucks.

For links to all major manufacturers go http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

]]> http://carfamily.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/best-diesel-powered-cars/feed/ 1 carfamily bmw90050382-zoom mercedes_benz_r_class_r350_bluetec_2010 Jetta%5FSportWagen%5F10%5Flr%2Ejpg a9Q7TDI_04_hr__thumb http://carfamily.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/the-best-2010-vehicles/ http://carfamily.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/the-best-2010-vehicles/#comments Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:19:48 +0000 carfamily http://carfamily.wordpress.com/?p=695 ]]>

The Best 2010 Vehicles

By The Car Family

For vehicle websites go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

After a long look at the 2010 vehicles it becomes clear that this is not a stellar one. The Audi Q5 is the best of the SUV/Trucks and the Kia Forte sedan is the best of the vehicles, although we found the Toyota Prius terrific. As for our best family vehicle, we would go with the Ford Fusion hybrid. And for the rich family vehicle, the Lexus RX 450h/RX 350 are useful, frugal, and hold their value.

Mom’s view: The Toyota Prius is great, but I just like to slide into a vehicle and so the Lexus RX is my favorite. I also enjoyed the Kia Soul more than I would like to admit. Comfortable and handy.

Dad’s view: The new Jaguar sedan with the supercharged engine is fun and dominating. You can run with the best sports cars and still enjoy the comforts of a large sedan. I also liked the Lexus RX and the Kia Soul.

Working woman’s view: The Nissan Cube is cute.  But what stole my heart was the Mercedes GLK with a diesel engine.  Awesome, and I probably am going to buy one in the future. That says something.

Young working male’s view:  I’m still making open source hardware for http://www.eracks.com and they are the most quiet units on the market. As such a treasure my comfort and so the Mercedes E Class and the Subaru Legacy and Outback are my choices

Alfa Romeo

This model year tends to reflect the down nature of the economy with a few bright spots for those with dough and risk takes. For example, Alfa Romeo is back with three Italian beauties. The Alfa Romeo 159 Sedan is a BMW 3 Series fighter with a 260 horsepower 3.2-liter V6 engine stunning looks and standard all-wheel drive all for about $35,000. Adding to that Italian Flair is the Alfa Romeo Brera 2 plus 2 Coupe that is really attractive and carries the same drive train as the 150 sedan. As usually, you have to pay more for something beautiful so the sleek two door should run a couple of grand more. Of course, going topless is the sole purpose of the Alfa Romeo Spider which should cost over $40,000 probably with the same V6 engine. We suggest wait and see.

Aston Martin

Aston Martin has more expensive eye candy for anyone to own who has a couple of hundred thousand dollars to spend. The Rapide has four door, a first, a first for this newly purchased company, and a 470 horsepower. For a hundred thousand dollars more you can own a smaller vehicle, the DBS Volante 2+2 and sit on 510-horsepower. That is the same horsepower you can feast upon in a Jaguar sedan that costs $80,000. There is also the One-77 for two million, a V12 with 700 horsepower and it is built to the owner’s specifications, more or less. Oh, the name? They are only going to build 77 of them. Hurry. You can get a lot more for a lot less.

Audi

Whether Audi’s winning streak lasts is in the hands of four new Audi vehicles. The A5 Cabriolet does away with the A4 in appearance only as most of the drivetrain is the same. Look for some more technology and a price a little over forty grand. You can also order supercharged version for a few thousand dollars more. Finally, the Audi S4, at around $50,000, is going to have a 3.0-liter  supercharged six-cylinder engine making about 335 horsepower and all wheel drive.  A BMW with a softer image.

BMW

BMW continues its quest to build some pretty strange looking vehicles, but they continue to succeed. The  Z4 well have a retractable hardtop and its excellent  twin-turbocharged 3.0-liter inline 6-cylinder engine as well as a base model sans the induction help starting in the mid-$40,000 range. For $80,000 you can harvest a large BMW 7-Series with a twin-turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 with 400 horsepower. Again, less horsepower than the Jaguar sedan, but it has more backseat room. Back to strange looking BMWs and the X6 M. For nearly ninety thousand dollars you can drive a very fast SUV that can rival the Porsche Cayenne in everything, including depreciation. Look for 550 plus horsepower from a twin-turbocharged V8. The base 3 Series is still the best BMW.

Buick Lacrosse

We don’t recommend General Motors products at this time. The Lacrosse is priced at about $28,000 and for that you can get a slightly used Lexus RX still under warranty for that price. Remember that General Motors only allows select people to test drive their vehicles so watch for bias in reviews.

Cadillac

We don’t recommend General Motors products at this time. Cadillac has a new sports wagon and more powerful engines in most of its products. The SRX and sports wagon cost nearly the same, about $34,000 and they both do essentially the same, with the wagon being more sprightly. We don’t get the pricing strategy, but we also don’t understand why GM hired back a leader who helped create the bankruptcy in the first place. Stick to the base CTS.

Ferrari

Ferrari California is offered at about $195,000. For that you get a retractable hardtop convertible, a 4.3-liter V8 that produces 460 horsepower, a seven-speed dual clutch transmission, and a Ferrari that makes the overpriced and poor riding Bentley look like yesterday. No wonder Bentley sales and resale are suffering.

Fiat 500

When it comes buy it. Pricing is fairly high for such a small machine, just below $20,000, but it is cute, rides well, and you can order it with a fuel sipping 1.4-liter 4-cylinder engine with 100. We recommend you delay your gratification until the more powerful engine becomes available.

Ford Mustang

It isn’t getting old and it is getting better, The Mustang looks much sharper this year and the handling has been smoothed. A myriad of engine choices. For about $20,000 you can have a car that makes the weird looking Chevrolet Camaro and bulking Chrysler Challenger like bad styling exercises.

Ford F-150 SVT Raptor

Expensive, high riding, and expensive, the F-150 Raptor is meant to destroy off-road obstacles and pass most everything except a gas station. $39,000.

Ford Taurus

We highly recommend the Ford Fusion. However,  if you need more leg and cargo space, the new Taurus is a darn good vehicle to consider, especially with a $26,000 asking price. Good fuel mileage, a six-speed automatic transmission and a 3.5 engine are standard. If you need more power and want to spend nearly $39,000 you can stuff your Taurus with the SHO turbocharged, 365 horsepower engine.

Ford Fusion

A bargain and fun to drive, the Fusion is now available as a hybrid that can easily get mid-30 mpg. Well priced at just over $20,000, the Fusion is just as good as the competition from Asia and the hybrid is one of the best family vehicles you can possess that offers exception fuel mileage.

Honda Insight

Priced below $20,000, the Insight is less expensive than the Toyota Insight, but you get a lot less. Fuel mileage in the low 40 mpg arena. Look for Toyota to offer a stripped Prius to offset the Honda’s price advantage. However, it won’t have the Honda handling.

Hyundai Genesis Coupe

Wow, for those who like a slick looking coupe that goes fairly well, the $23,000 Genesis coupe is a must drive. The turbocharged 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine and the 3.8-liter V6 produce 210 and 306 horsepower respectively. Why pay more?

Jaguar XJ Series

This stunning sedan is available with an extended-wheelbase and potent powertrains from the base 5.0-liter V8 and its 385 horsepower, to the .XJL Supercharged 470 horsepower version, to the Supersport’s 510 horsepower engine. Safety wise the Jaguar offers ABS, traction control, antiskid system, curtain side airbags, and front side airbags. Add to that Jaguar’s Adaptive Dynamics adjustable air suspension and you have a sweet riding sedan. You can also add a dual-screen DVD entertainment system. The Supersport is a bargain for those who like their sedan to truly leap. One of our favorites. Priced just under $70,000.

Jeep Grand Cherokee

As the much anticipated Chevrolet Volt is said to be the most important vehicle to General Motors, the Grand Cherokee is even more vital to Chrysler. To this end they are offering extended warranties on the drivetrain and a less ancient styling. Pricing is expected to be just over $30,000, but more importantly, you are going to own a vehicle with a nicer interior and better handling than any previous model.  Well worth the late for those that need the Grand Cherokee’s legendary off-road ability.

Kia Soul

A real surprise, the Kia Soul can be bought for under $15,000 and you get a very useful and fun car to drive. It has a high seating position and both the 1.6-liter 4-cylinder engine and 142 horsepower 2.0-liter 4-cylinder get good gas mileage. The large tires give a sturdy ride, but that is the sole concern with the Soul. Another one of our favorites.

Kia Forte

Yet another bargain from Kia, the Forte is a sedan that has an available 173 horsepower 2.4-liter 4-cylinder engine and room for five all for under $15,000. Kia is on a roll, pun intended.

Kia Forte Koup

A two door version of the Forte for under $20,000.

Kia Sorrento

The Sorrento is leaner, but still not nearly competitive with the other crossovers at this time. However, Kia dealers are willing to deal and the new engine choices might make this a thrifty hauler. Well under $25,000 and look for good deals.

Lexus IS C

This convertible relies on the Lexus name and stunning interior to gather new customers. The base engine is barely adequate, and the larger engined IS 350C and its 3.5-liter, 306 horsepower V6 drives up the price thousands. Look to pay over $40,000 and for that you get a retractable hardtop and Lexus service.  Watch for those bulging side panels in parking lots, though.

Lexus RX 450h

Another giant leap forward for the best crossover in the land, the Lexus RX. This time Lexus has improved the performance and offers a plethora of new technology treats for those who want the $42,000 smoothmobile. You can easily get over 30 mpg and there is plenty of pep, but the reality is that the base RX offers nearly the same mileage for much less. Drive them both.

Lexus HS 250h

Not the best Lexus when it comes to styling, the HS 250h is a larger Prius with the Camry hybrid’s 2.4-liter engine. Rides well and is pretty perky, but it is priced in the mid-$30,000 range and the fuel mileage isn’t that much better than the terrific Toyota Corolla.

Lincoln MKT

We like Lincoln, but we don’t always understand their attraction. They seldom are different than the base Ford they are based on, but that may all be in the past as the MKT comes online. A stunning interior, an attention getting exterior and ample power. Priced in the mid-$40,000 range. Our advise, buy the turbocharged engine with its 355 horsepower.

Mazda3

More versions of this poor man’s BMW, the Mazda3 in the form of a four and five door and a souped-up sizzler, this fun and frugal winner has seen its interior expanded, but not its powertrain.  Prices start around $17,000. The Speed version threatens the pavement with a 2.3-liter engine creating 263 horsepower. Can you say torque steer?

Mercedes-Benz S400 Hybrid

For nearly $90,000 you can own the luxurious S Class Mercedes that combines the power of the base engine with that of electric motors to give a big push to a big car without sacrificing too much fuel. Personally, we think the Bluetec diesel is the best offering, but it does not come in the S model.

Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe

A very large coupe at a good price, the $54,000 E-Class is available with an optional 382-horsepower V8 to provide a lot of go in this attractive two door.

Mercedes-Benz GLK

An optical illusion, this SUV is actually small on the outside, but large on the inside. Available with the diesel, which would make it perfect, it also comes with a 3.5-liter V6 engine and a potent 268 horses. Priced below $35,000. The best MB SUV.

Mercedes-Benz M-Class Hybrid

Priced around $50,000, this SUV combines a 3.5-liter V6 engine with a continuously variable transmission and two electric motors to make it seriously fast and still get fuel mileage above 20 mpg. In reality, this is better than the General Motors products in the form of the Cadillac Escalade hybrids, but lacks the polish of the Lexus RX 450h. Stick with the M-Class.

MINI Crossman

A MINI on steroids, the all wheel drive Crossman is a tall, stubby, attention getting version of the MINI that uses a turbocharged 1.6-liter 4-cylinder engine with 172 horsepower to push it through the considerable turbulence its design creates. For about $30,000 you can drive something different.

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Sporty in appearance and handling, this Lancer can be ordered with all wheel drive and the station wagon styling makes it very family friendly. The hot rod Ralliart version is also planned. Priced under $30,000, the Sportback is the most utilitarian of the Lancers, but look for dealers to offer some good pricing.

Nissan

The 370 Z convertible is here and this two-seater is a hoot to drive, especially considering its base pricing of just over $40,000 well equipped. For a lot less you can have the hard top version with the same engine, transmission, and suspension. With prices starting around $30,000, the 370Z comes with a 332 horsepower V6,  six-speed manual transmission and the must have SynchroRev Match system that automatically matches engine speed to your selected gear on downshifts. A real bargain, but there is a lot of competition in the sporty car field now with the upgraded Mustang, Chevrolet Camaro, Chrysler Challenger, and Hyundai Genesis coupe.

Nissan’s Cube is a box with a little style and a lot of utility. The poster car for funky, the Cube has an asymmetrical rear glass and a side opening rear hatch. For about $14,000 this eye catcher can do your daily chores without much fuss thanks to the 1.8-liter 4-cylinder engine with 122 horsepower. There is a lot of competition in this niche once dominated by the Scion B and D. Now the pressure comes from the Kia Soul.

Porsche Panamera

This is a four door Porsche that comes in two forms, fast and faster. The 4400 pound sedan comes in either two or four wheel drive, but with engines pushing from 400 horsepower to 500 horsepower version. Certainly usable for a family, but at $125,000 plus it is best left to those who enjoy the status of owning this unusual vehicle.

Rolls-Royce Ghost

Why bother. Another Rolls gas hog that serves no purpose that a vehicle half its cost does not provide. A good way to spit in the face of environmentalists while getting the best parking spot at upscale restaurants.

Saab 9-5

Probably due much later in the model year, the new Saab 9-5 is a knockout. Nothing else much new from Saab due to its sale, but used Saabs are a bargain and the 2006 anniversary edition convertible remains one of the great undervalued and automobile collector bargains with only 400 produced. (see photo)

Smart fortwo ED

We love the Smart cars, except for the jerky transmissions. They are a hoot to drive and with this version you even get good gas mileage thanks to its electric motors. Another of our favorites.

Subaru Legacy

Bigger and sort of better, the $20,000 Legacy is larger and better looking, but the weak base engine still is challenged in mountain driving even with the new 6-speed manual transmission. We highly recommend the more expensive 3.6-liter flat-six engine option. Another one of our favorites.

Subaru Outback

Essentially the same as the Legacy, but with fancier exterior parts, the one to own is the
2.5 GT.  Priced under $25,000

Suzuki Kizashi
The Kizashi is a totally new direction for Suzuki to grow with a appealing exterior, a 2.4-liter, dual overhead cam four-cylinder engine mated to either a six-speed manual transmission or a CVT, all wheel drive option, and the promise of more power to come. Lots of promises from Suzuki such as upscale audio systems, lots of safety equipment, and a price not much over $20,000. If you are interested in smaller vehicle this is a must drive.

Toyota Prius

Another winner from Toyota. The new Prius is much superior to the previous generation in every way from better fuel mileage to improved cargo room. Prices start about $23,000.  Awesome, but the tires are noisy and the handling is for the slow goers. Easily one of the best cars of 2010. Another one of our favorites.

Volkswagen GTI

It looks the same, but the GTI I much improved, although the powertrain remains virtually the same with a turbocharged 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine with 200 horsepower and 6-speed manual or dual-clutch gearbox. Not inexpensive at $26,000, the handling and versatility of this VW might just spark new interest.

Volkswagen Golf

A well priced Volkswagen; the Golf is essentially the old Rabbit with a 2.5-liter gasoline four-cylinder engine or the highly desirable 2.0-liter diesel pushing the wind aside. Excellent fuel mileage and a $17,000 price tag make this a good vehicle for those who like to drive, but still enjoy passing a gas station.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo wagon remains one of the best you can buy for safety and room, especially the XC 70. However, the pricing on these big wagons is steep and so Volvo is offering the XC60. This smaller, Volvo wagon has an abundance of safety features and the  3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six with its 285 horsepower has just enough power to move this crossover. The all-wheel-drive unit and better handling make this a better choice than its longer brother. Look for prices around $38,000. This is the best Volvo.

For vehicle reviews go to http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

Toyota Venza: Pretty Practical

by The Car Family

for more reviews go to http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

for a list of vehicle websites go to

http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

This new and very different Toyota has a place in the driveway for those who find the Highlander too tall, the Lexus RX too expensive, and the Sienna too vanny. For a starting price of $26,000 you can order a vehicle that is not only difficult to categorize, but one that is difficult to evaluate. The reason is simple, this is a very large crossover with a Lexus like feel and yet it is noisy and ponderous. Indeed, this was not our favorite Toyota. The huge tires created a steady hum, the very expensive luxury option package was overly complicated and the rear seats did not fold flat and you even had to remove the headrests to get them to fold at all.

The Venza feels big even though it is the same size as a Camry, abeit lower, and is the same width and about the same price as a Highlander. In other words, it is high, wide, and and weights nearly as much as the Highlander. Interestingly, it also has a larger turning radius with the Venza needing a vast 39 ft. to turn, which makes it difficult in tight parking garages. You really need that optional rear view screen when you buy the Venza due to the poor visibility to the back and sides.

There are two engine choices, the best being the 2.7-liter four-cylinder that provides an ample 182 horsepower with real world gas mileage about 23 mpg. The 3.5-liter V6 makes 268 hp and you can expect about 21 mpg, but if you order the all wheel drive model go with the larger engine. With the 17 plus gallon tank you can easily go over 400 miles on the highway with either engine.

Cargo space is 70 cubic feet while the Highlander gives you 95. What we are tying to say is that the Highlander is more car for the money, and you have the optional third row of seating. However, the Venza is sleeker, lower, and has a much better interior. We think it should appeal to those who find the Camry to common and the Highlander boring. We don’t think it is going to be a big seller, but its looks appealed to a lot of people and they may be enough to justify its success.

Mom’s view: I did not like the poor visibility and the large turning radius. This is not a car for city dwellers who don’t have their own parking spaces. You sit high, but you can’t see the Venza’s front end. The GPS is not the best and we found it difficult to use, and the stereo and the dual-zone HVAC controls require patience to master. The screen is easy to read, but the map symbols are too small and the whole thing is overly complicated.

Driving the Venza, even with the V6, is dull. The brakes are soft, the handling soft, and the acceleration is soft. The road noise from the 20 inch tires is tiring. Essentially, this is a Camry station wagon and yet the Camry is much more responsive. But the Venza interior, ah, the interior. It is lovely. There is a center console that provides for all types of storage and the shifter is high and easy to reach. However, there isn’t much feel to. You can easily carry five adults in comfort and the Venza is loaded with standard equipment. The base model includes 19-inch alloy wheels, auto headlights, dual-zone automatic climate control, tilt and telescoping steering wheel, power driver seat, 60/40 rear seat, auto-dimming rear view mirror, universal garage-door opener, cruise control, trip computer and a stereo with CD changer and auxiliary audio input.

Nevertheless, there is an abundance on options on the Venza that are mostly grouped into packages. I highly recommend the power tailgate and rear view camera. The HID headlamps are above average and the sound system may appeal to some with its 13-speakers and Bluetooth and satellite radio. Those who want to stupefy their children by having them stare at a movie while traveling can order the rear-seat DVD entertainment system.

Safety wise the Venza comes standard with four-wheel anti lock disc brakes, stability and traction control, front-seat side airbags, side curtain airbags, a driver knee airbag and front-seat active head restraints.

The new Venza looks great, but it wasn’t my cup of tea due to its ponderous driving feel and lack of crispness. If you are coming from a SUV you will probably feel right at home.

Young working woman’s view: An interesting vehicle and one with appeal in its appearance and utility, the Venza, nevertheless there is a lot that needs more thought. For example, the optional 10.2 inch screen for the flip-down DVD player blocks the rear view mirror. The electric power steering feels disconnected and the Venza requires a very large turning radius. If you use the wireless DVD player the signal can interfere with the stereo radio volume. The middle rear seat needs more padding and the air conditioning/heating ducts are placed so that the steering wheel intercepts the flow. The center console has the transmission shifter mounted near the dash and this leaves lots of room for cupholders, iPods. There is even a special compartment for MP3 players and the like. Despite all the room for storage, there is no handy space for your purse as there was in the early model RX. Indeed, that model remains the best use of interior space of any vehicle we have ever tested.

The noise from the large side mirrors and large tires creates a din at highway speed and the seats aren’t that comfortable for me. I think larger people would enjoy them more. The Venza does not isolate you from the feel of the road although large bumps are clearly felt.

Finally, the Venza, despite its size, does not have a third row of seating. For that you need to go to the Highlander. The good news is that space can be put to good use for hauling practically anything this side of a sofa/chesterfield,couch,davenport and it even enables backseat passengers to recline their seats. There are 70 cubic feet of storage in back and the floor is level when the rear seats are folded down.

I would not buy the Venza for three reasons. First, it has large blind spots and is not easy to park. Secondly, the brakes and steering feel are too soft. Finally, it is attractive inside and out, but the pricing with the options I like push the cost way past that of a RAV 4, which holds more and gets similar fuel mileage.I also think that the speedometer font is too small.

Young working male’s view: I just didn’t find the stereo system up to snuff. The controls for the air conditioning and heating could easily be simplified, and you really need to remove the rear headrests and make sure the optional rear seat monitor is up or your limited rear mirror vision is even more limited. The wireless system works well, since I work making some of the lowest priced American open source computers and servers for http://eracks.com/ I wonder why no computer input port?

The large tires look good, but they are going to cost a bundle to replace and they are not quiet riding. Here is my thumbnail about the Venza; stick with the basic model, engine, front wheel drive, skip the options except the automatic rear door closer and rear view camera and drive carefully. It is good looking, handy, and won’t cause you to lose any points off of your driver’s license.

Dad’s view: The Venza and the Saab are two of the few cars that cater to pets. You can order a rear hatch pet ramp for easy loading and unloading, a leash tether for securing pets in the vehicle, a pet booster seat with harness, a first/second row or cargo area pet barrier, pet seatbelt buckles and rear seat zip line-style harnesses as well as waterproof and removable hammock-style seat covers for this Toyota. That says it all about the Venza. A fine suburban commuter for family and man’s best friend. It won’t challenge or offend you. Sort of pretty, but certainly practical.

There are two engine choices, a new 2.7-liter, 182-horsepower inline-four and a 3.5-liter, 268 horsepower V-6. The base engine is adequate, except for those Venza’s with all wheel drive. For that model step-up to the V-6. Towing limits are 2500 pounds for the four-cylinder and 1000 more for the larger powerplant. In either case the six-speed automatic transmission is excellent.

The major drawback to driving the Venza is its handling. It is very vague and the use of large tires does little to improve it cornering, but harshens the ride. The brake feel is adequate, but I would like more action early on when depressing the pedal.

No doubt this is a great grocery getter and the high sitting position, wide doors, and easy entry and exit height make it a natural for both families with young children and older folks. In other words, for those usually not needing to push the speed limit. Other than that this is a great car/wagon/crossover/SUV.

Family conference: The Venza draws a fair amount of attention and is price well. Thus it has the earmarks of another success for Toyota. It does have shortcomings, the worst of which is the lack of visibility and the noise from the engine, tires, and side mirrors. By the way, we all loved the large size of those mirrors and were very willing to turn up the stereo a bit to cancel out the wind noise. The Venza may not be easy to classify, but for many it is going to offer the best combination of fuel mileage, cargo capacity, and reliability. You might also consider the Subaru Forester, the Nissan Murano, and the Ford Edge. Or, Toyota’s own RAV4.

2010 Jaguar XF R: Best Jaguar Sedan ever

by The Car Family

for more reviews go to http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

Why anyone would spend over twice as much for a Bentley is beyond us. The Jaguar XFR is better in every dynamic way, expect top speed, and after 150 mph only your medical insurance carrier would care. The Jaguar XFR only falls short in two areas and that is its information center and lack of rear seat legroom. Someone at Jaguar needs to be punished for making the emergency brake control and the transmission selection knob of metal. Maybe it doesn’t get to be 100 degrees in England, but in the US you can burn yourself as we learned the hard way.

This Jaguar is so fast that for its $80,000 list price you are actually stealing the car. The Audi RS6, BMW M5, and Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG are in the same category, but none of them combine the interior arrangements and exterior elegance of the Jaguar not to mention that it is quite capable of getting over 20 mph on the highway. Of course, the traction control is a bit of a nag, but all in all this is a Jaguar that truly bounds down the road in style and in a hurry. As much as we like the Mercedes E63’s grunt and go, the Jaguar is just more handsome and sporty. Sadly, very few people even knew it was a Jaguar and fewer yet that it was the supercharged version. Apparently, Jaguar needs a more aggressive advertising campaign.

The heart of this sleek sedan is a supercharged 5.0-liter V8 creating a very useable 510 horsepower and 460 lb-ft of torque. The six-speed automatic transmission can be controlled with steering wheel mounted shift paddles, but there is so much torque it is easier just to press the joy peddle and hang on. Getting to 60 mph takes under five seconds without trying, although there is hesitation from the transmission when you floor the accelerator. Jaguar also offers an electronically controlled limited-slip differential. To give you some idea of how fast this Jaguar is you can keep abreast of most Porsche, Corvette, or Ferrari variants even with the family on-board and groceries in the trunk. The highly regarded BMW M5 must be driven perfectly to match this easy to launch Jaguar and the BMW is a pain to drive in traffic. The Jaguar is breathtaking and worth every penny if you love to drive and can afford about 19 mpg in mixed driving. However, that number is almost impossible to achieve as you are simply not going to be able to resist the urge to unleash this cat at every opportunity. And why not with the quarter mile arriving in under 13 seconds at 112 mph, and you are driving a 4300 pound luxury car.

The main competitor, in terms of performance, is the Cadillac CTS-V, but we doubt many people would cross shop these two despite the Cadillac’s price advantage. The Jaguar is much more the elegant of the two and has the looks that make it a classic. The Cadillac has crisper handling and a more sporty demur.

Mom’s view: What a sweetheart. In the right color, and blue is not its color, this sedan calls attention to itself in a way Amy Winehouse could only dream. It is subtle, yet striking in its proportions. The ride, thanks to the new Adaptive Dynamics suspension system, is sporty, but not abrupt. The extremely wide tires riding on 20 inch rims do create noise over roughened surfaces, but this is a car meant for those who like to drive and are willing to tolerate such intrusions for the extra grip.

There are some subtle differences between the supercharged XFR and its more placid non-supercharged brother such as hood louvers, twin-dual tailpipes, a rear spoiler and heavy mesh chromed grille. Inside the XFR has seats that are comfortable, but not accommodating for those looking at fat loss programs. The dark oak interior trim was nice, but the aluminum bits got very hot in the sun. I found plenty of safety features with the radar-based Blind Spot Monitor being especially valuable due to the blind spots created by the large C pillars on the sedan. The back-up camera was easy to use thanks to the lines that showed where the car was heading in much the same manner as the best one that Nissan has been offering for several years. The interior is an interesting arrangement of leather, aluminum and plastic that are much more modern looking than previous Jaguar sedans. It is modern and yet classic with the shades of charcoal gray cloth and leather providing an inviting place to spend time. Only Audi offers anything close to this elegant.

Safety wise the XKR offers anti lock brakes, depowered airbags, head and side airbags, and traction and stability control. The car crash test ratings have not been posted yet, but most Ford designed vehicles do well and that company is responsible for the engineering of this Jaguar.

Dad’s view: This is not a graceful car. It reminds me of a bodybuilder in an expensive suit. Nevertheless, it is a grand ride and the engine is inspirational. I miss the supercharger whine, but this is a luxury car not a boy racer. The twin vortex supercharger sits astride the V8’s aluminum heads and block and pushes the pressure through the DOHC motivated four valves per cylinder that enable the rather small 305 cubic inch mill to produce 510 horsepower and 461 lb-ft. of torque. Two intercoolers densing the air and direct injection sweetening the deal. The engine’s redline is 6900 rpm, but what is stellar about this Jaguar is that the engine starts to produce thrust at only 2500 rpm.

When you are driving this rig you barely need to touch the accelerator pedal to keep pace with traffic. The slightest pressure and the engine responds immediately with a not so gentle forward thrust that can have you at immodest speeds in seconds. Self-control is mandatory when piloting the XFR. The transmission can be controlled by shift paddles or by just letting the six-speed automatic do the thinking for you. I never really bothered with using the sport mode to quicken the shifts. The electronic differential does it best to keep the car straight and those large tires help as well. You can stiffen the spring rates if you like to run the canyons, but the forte of this Jaguar is the way it effortless bounds down the highway listening to the 20-inch wheels sing their song and enough buttons to keep you occupied for hours with decisions about traction control, suspension, and even the treat of playing with the Dynamic Mode that holds the Jag in gears longer. The new ZF Six-Speed transmission also has a Winter Mode that softens the initial acceleration for better traction. The Adaptive Dynamics suspension monitors each wheel independently 100 times a second and all you have to do is make the payments.

Overall, this is a nice touring car, but it isn’t a sports car. It can easily keep up with any other vehicle in its realm on the road, but it isn’t the best cornering machine. Gas mileage was very good for so much power and I was able to get 21 mpg on one highway trip. That may have been my greatest driving exploit in years, though. Too much temptation only a toe tip away.

Young working woman’s view: Jaguar is now owned by Tata Motors of India and the first thing they have done is produced another version of the XF sedan called the Premium. This gives buyers three choices starting with the base, if you can call it that, model with a 4.2-liter V8 that produces 300 horsepower, the Premium with a larger 5.0-liter V8 with 385 horsepower, and our test vehicle, the XFR with 510 horsepower. I would estimate that you are going to get over 20 mpg with the base version and about 18 with the larger engined Jaguars. The night lighting the XFR was extraordinary. Only the big Infiniti comes anywhere near it. The interior lighting is too soft.

Getting into the sedan wearing a dress isn’t too much of a concern, but the bucket seats have fairly high bolsters, do getting out definitely requires an assist from the door arm rests. The monitor is small and it is best if you spend considerable time with this beast to learn its mannerism before partaking of its enthusiasm.

I would love to own the new Jaguar, but I would go with the non-supercharged version. The $20,000 or so additional cost of the technology showpiece isn’t really needed for around town travel and the speed camera adorned highways that mar the scenery. Very lovely, but I really don’t think having special rims that proclaim “supercharged” as well as an electronic assisted rear differential are necessary for my needs.

Young working male’s view: The speedometer font is way, way too small. And when you drive a vehicle with this much power you had better watch it as you are always challenging the posted limits. The sophisticated traction control makes wet weather traveling much easier considering the generous helping of torque the engine produces. The steering is quick and the huge vented disc brakes, nearly 15 inches in and 14.8 in back, are reassuring. The XFR never feels small or nimble, but it does feels boastful and understated at the same time. Oxymoronic perhaps, but with its sleek lines and brute force acceleration buyers might tend to overlook its areas of concern. First, the very wide, Dunlop SP Sport Maxx rubber, 255/35 in front and 285/30 in the rear are tiresome to hear groaning away on some grooved concrete roadways. Next, the rear seat does not have a lot of leg room if you are tall. Next, the

center touch display screen is just too irritating with all its menus and I just can’t comprehend why you need both a starting fob and a start button. The dial shifter takes a while to understand, but why not just a lever. The same goes for the rotating vents that move when the car is turned on and to what purpose. To me it is just something else that could go wrong. The info-entertainment system has a screen that is very small and you need to use it for such simply tasks as setting the radio stations all the way to the heat settings for the seats. The touch screen does have a useful back button, but it is still overly complicated. The Bowers and Wilkins audio system is above average with over 500 watts, but the radio reception is poor. It has a 17.7 cubic ft. of trunk space, but the opening is smallish and the lift over high.

On the plus side of the ledger is the XFR’s passing ability. It may not be the fastest sedan to 60 mph, but when it comes to passing a vehicle going that speed it sails by with plenty in reserve. The Jag weighs 4300 pounds, but feels heavier and you are going to be looking for a premium fuel station after about 320 miles.

The point here is two-fold. First, would I buy this car and secondly, is it worth 80 grand. Well, it is really too much car for me. I don’t have many opportunities to play with so much power. And, I can’t afford the insurance let alone the payments. Suffice to say that this car is not meant for my demographic group, but it might be. It certainly gets more eyes than the BMW and Audi and Cadillac and that counts for something.

Family conference: The entire family loved the XFR and clearly the breed is in good hands under its new ownership. This Jaguar is a great balance of good looks and performance while not forgetting that you should be able to take it grocery shopping with ease. The trunk opens perfectly, getting in and out isn’t a trial, and the quality makes this the best Jaguar ever and one with claws, even without it trademark Jaguar hood ornament.  As for waiting until Porsche brings out its Panamera, you probably are wasting your time. It is going to be more expensive, no doubt, but we would put my money on the XFR for full frontal power. As a negative, the “Jaguar Sense” glove box sensor isn’t worth it.

for a list of vehicle websites go to

http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

Prius vs. Insight: Battle of the Compact Hybrids

by

The Car Family

for a list of vehicle websites go to

http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

for more views go to

http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

As much alike as these two Japanese products look, they are almost totally dissimilar in all aspects save that they are hybrids and get about average fuel mileage. The Honda Insight is good handling and less expensive. The Prius is larger and gets better fuel mileage. Go figure.

Prius

Insight

Because they are so different selecting one to buy is easy providing you know how you are going to use the sedan. For example, if you love to drive on two lane roads, aren’t too tall, have a slow commute, and seldom need to carry four people the Honda is ideal. It is a good handler, for a hybrid that is. On the other hand, if you want a bit more frisk from the accelerator pedal, more room, and the ability to travel the expressways welcome the Prius into your life.

The fuel mileage for both are fairly close in daily driving. We got about 50 mpg in mixed driving with the Toyota and about 45 with the Insight. Mind you, the Prius has a power button you press that enables you to combine the torque of the electric motors and engine to make it easier to pass and to pull on busy freeways and it is addicting. We found that both vehicles got nearly the same fuel mileage on the open highway with the more powerful Toyota achieving about two miles per gallon more.

The interiors of these rigs are very different. The backseat of the Prius has three more inches of legroom and it is much more comfortable to sit there. With the rear seats folded down the Prius has eight more cubic feet of storage space. In other words, by any stretch the Prius is more user friendly.

Prius dash

Insight dash

Price, on the other hand, clearly goes to the Insight. It is nearly $2000 less expensive even when loaded with options such as a navigation system. The cost cutting is evident in the interior materials as well as the less sophisticated hybrid system. There are two models, the EX and LX of which the former is the more well equipped model. With the more expensive models you get a stereo upgrade, steering wheel mounted paddle shifters, vehicle stability assist and traction control, and alloy wheels. The top of the line EX with Navigation models adds Honda Satellite-Linked Navigation System with Voice Recognition, Bluetooth, HandsFreeLink, illuminated steering wheel-mounted audio, navigation and phone controls. Look for loaded models to cross the $25,000 barrier.

The Prius starts at nearly $23,000 and quickly escalates to over $29,000 loaded. There are four versions of the Prius, starting with the basic II. The basic model and Prius III, IV, and V all offer the same powertrain, but add a variety of features that are very interesting. You can have water repellent side windows (don’t ask), a GPS system that uses DVD and voice activation, a JBL stereo with four CD disc changer, XM radio with traffic updates, dynamic radar cruise control, intelligent parking assist, the solar roof package with sliding moonroof, a pre-collision system, LED headlamps, and 17-inch tires.

On the road neither car is quiet, but the tires and ride on the Honda are much more sporty. The Toyota’s tires followed every grove in the road and the steering wheel shook mightily at times. I attribute that to the tire choice. We had the optional larger tires. I would drive the PriusII, with its smaller ones and compare the two. Personally, even though we were the only automobile journalists who selected the Prius as family car of the year when it first came out and also when the newer version arrived, we found that the tire characteristics and noise levels on the 2010 models are really not to our liking. We would gladly pay a mile or two less for better handling footwear. No question, the Insight is the more sporty of the two.

Mom’s view: Safety wise the Prius has front, side, and head curtain airbags, active head restraints, ABS, a knee airbag, and electronic stability control. The Insight lacks the knee bag and only makes the stability control available on its more upscale EX model. Crash testing on the Honda has not been done yet, but the previous generation Prius results were good.

Driving these cars is best described as boring. Except for the playful use of the Power button in the Prius they were bland and appliance like inside and out. The less expensive Smart cars were more fun, but they didn’t get past that magic 40 mpg barrier. I felt more comfortable in the Insight and liked the seats better, but the cargo capacity of the Prius was very useful. Getting into Honda was more difficult for me as the Insight sits lower. Neither car has a make-up mirror that would meet the approval of anyone over the age of 15, but the glove compartments and other storage areas in the Prius were more useful. You don’t feel as if you are in a small car while driving either hybrid, but if you need to make quick moves the Honda’s steering is more sensitive.

From a mommy standpoint, the Prius makes more sense so I would choose the Toyota.

Dad’s view: So alike and so different continues our theme. The cars both have four cylinder engines, but the Toyota’s is much more powerful, if that’s the word. The Insight has an 88-horsepower, 1.3-liter engine and a 13-hp electric motor, for a total of 98 hp whereas the Prius boasts of a 1.8 liter engine with 98-horsepower and an 80-hp electric motor that yields 134 hp.

Prius engine

Honda engine

If all goes well, both cars can drive a limited amount of time on battery power, but they have different systems. The parallel design of the Honda insight versus the Parallel/Series design of the Prius. For the non-engineering types these mean little and a real life both do extremely well. At stop lights the both automatically shut down the engines except in temperature extremes where keeping the engines running is necessary for safety and creature comfort.

What enables the larger engined Prius to get better fuel mileage is that the Prius can move using just battery power and the Insight does not have this feature. It takes a very gentle touch to keep the Prius from starting the engine from a stop sign or light. The other feature is the larger engine does not have to work as hard and can produce useful acceleration at lower rpms. The Insight engine does have the ability to shut off its engine when coasting in some cases. The simplicity of the Insight’s system makes it less costly to produce and thus the less expensive pricing.

What we all treasured about the Prius was its driving mode buttons. You have a choice of Eco or Power and the Prius always starts in the Eco setting. There is also another fun button to press and that is the EV control. That enables the Prius to use only electric power when possible. In every traffic jam we used the EV and it gave us miles of quiet progress without using the gasoline engine. After 25 mph the Prius abandons the EV for the Eco setting.

The battery packs for both models should be good for many years and they utilize the more traditional nickel-metal-hydride cells. We have a lot of qualms about the new lithium ion batteries having extensive experience with them on our electric assist bicycles. They appear to be more efficient, but the longevity is what we question.

The handling on the Prius is improved with better aerodynamics and a better under tray that helps defuse the wind better. The Honda is much better and almost playful. On a smooth highway both vehicles are easy to drive, but you really need to plan your passing in advance as neither is going to flatten your innards. As much as I like the grown-up appeal of the Toyota, the tossable nature of the Honda is more to my liking. However, the Insight greatly needs another ten horsepower.

Young business woman’s view: The Insight troubles me. I love the Honda Fit and consistently achieve around 33 mpg. You get great handling, a lot of cargo room, and it costs less nearly $5000 less than an Insight. Of course, if your daily commute is well under 40 mph the Insight could save you on fuel. The Prius and the Insight looked so much alike, especially from the side, that I don’t think many people are even going to recognize the Insight. However, I liked the look of the Insight better, especially from the side and front, where it looked far more futuristic. Neither car appeals to me other than its “greenness” and to marvel at the gas mileage read out in the 40 to 50 mpg range. I would rather have a Toyota Corolla or a Honda Fit. Of course, if I had to choice between these two hybrids the Toyota would win mainly because it offers more room and I love its acceleration.

An interesting option on the Prius is the sunroof with a solar panel that generates electricity for running fans inside the car can help keep the interior cooler on hot days. You can also order leather surfaced seats and a GPS unit. Beware, if you do order this ensemble, the cost could top thirty grand. Talking with sales people at several dealerships I was surprised that the high line model was a big seller along with the model that is not the base, the model three. Apparently, the Prius has crossed over from trendy hybrid to nice compact sedan.

Both have good GPS systems, but the screens are small and they greatly add to the cost of both vehicles. The Honda’s was quicker to react and a touch easier to master. Parking was a cinch with the Prius with a turning radius of 34 feet, it was nearly two feet tighter than the Honda.

As for my choice, the Toyota was the winner. I would go with the Prius III, I don’t need all those extras on the fancier models, but do appreciate the larger tires and other features that Prius II does not have. The Insight was a nicer drive, but I like more power and room.

Young working male’s view: It might not sound like much, but the Insight only has a ten gallon tank. Although yields about 400 miles, the fact that the fuel gauge looks close to empty at just past 320 miles makes it unfun. Statistically, you have about a gallon in reserve and so each quarter of tank reflects a little over two gallons of gas. That does not bode well for confidence when traveling long distances. The other concern about the Insight is that it does not respond well to calls for acceleration at any time. It sort of leans forward more. It is not that getting onto a crowded expressway is so frustrating, it is passing in the mountains. Can you say VW bus? The stereo reception in the Prius is poor and the quality of the base unit disappointing. The Honda was slightly better, but clearly not great. As for the Prius, no one knew it was the new one. Even the color selection is dull and the interior selection is duller. As for babe magnets, I would say not a chance for either model. Would I buy one, nope. I like the Ford Fusion and Ford Escape hybrids better, but mainly what I would like to see is a Honda Element hybrid. If family impeded I would wish for the new Toyota Sienna van to have a hybrid version.

Prius engine control buttons

Family conference: The Prius continues to be our favorite and it is greatly improved over previous models. The Insight would be a star if not compared to the Prius. It is fun to drive, wonderfully entertaining, and steady on the highway. The tilting point was the Prius Power button that called on all of that Toyota technology into action and made you feel that you were sitting in a turbocharged vehicle. Most fun, and most for your money if you can lay off the sweet options. There is clearly a difference in these two vehicles that extends beyond similarities of shape and purpose. The Honda is clearly going to appeal to Honda owners with its ride and frugality. Just as clearly, the Toyota with its softer ride and more goodies is going to continue to attract previous Toyota owners. For those new to hybrids, the Toyota has the greater mainstream appeal.

Prius vs. Prius:  Show me the MPG

by The Car Family

http://www.motorists.org/carfamily/home/most-reliable-vehicles/

Is the new Prius worth the extra $2000 over the excellent previous model? Absolutely. The new Prius is brilliant. That is if you are not looking for a sports car or one that moves you with passion. In other words, the new Prius is a compact sedan where virtue lies in its frugality, not in its funality. It handles better, gets superior fuel mileage, has more useful interior space and more storage areas.

However:

Braking in the new Prius is good, but the brake feel is wooden and non-linear. This is due to the regeneration energy for the battery pack that is created while braking.

50 miles plus per gallon

The two part rear window, one angled and the other straight, make using the rear view mirrors night position setting of questionable value. The window divider and the different glass tinting make it difficult to ascertain the distance of vehicles following the Prius. We found it better not to use the night vision setting.

50 miles per gallon

The cupholders are too shallow and too small to hold larger cups.

50 miles per gallon

The tires follow groves in the highway and cause a continuing shuttering that can be easily felt through the steering wheel. The tires are also a bit noisy and their grip in the wet is just adequate.

50 miles per gallon

The huge front window lets in a great deal of the sun’s heat and when combined with the large rear window provide a challenge for the air-conditioning, which takes away from the gas mileage.

50 miles per gallon

The Prius has three buttons, one that enables the vehicle to run just on battery power up to about 20 mph under certain conditions. We never were able to get it to go much above 10 mpg. It requires a feather touch.

50 miles per gallon

The Prius has three buttons, one that enables the vehicle to choose its own best gas mileage setting. Why does it need this button when it automatically selects it?

50 miles per gallon

The Prius has a power button that combines both the gas engine’s power and the electric motor’s output to provide a burst of acceleration when needed. This is fine for pulling onto freeways, but when you need power in a hurry such as in an avoidance maneuver, who has time to find the button?

50 miles per gallon

The Prius has heated seats, but the buttons to activate them are below the dash in a hollowed out area. They are difficult to reach, to say the least, and although the pass through that was created offers a useful storage area, a sharp turn can bring anything you place there tumbling out close to the accelerator pedal.

50 mpg

The options can be expensive. Indeed, if you want the LED headlights you have to buy the nearly $29,000 version of the Prius to get them. You can’t get the larger, 17 inch tires, on the base model.

50 mpg

50 miles per gallon

The console mounted shift lever is easy to reach, but lacks significant feel and so you can easily miss the gear you want to reach. The Prius does have a park button on the center console and there is also a parking niche for the shifter. It can become confusing at first.

50 miles per gallon

The small readouts located just under the front windshield are difficult to read and the font is small. In fact, all of the fonts are too small.

50 miles per gallon

The rear seats fold flat, they have a 60-40 split, but you need to remove the headrests first or move the front seats forward.

50 miles per gallon.

The interior lighting is just adequate and not good in back.

50 miles per gallon

The base seats in the Prius don’t offer enough lumbar support and are difficult to adjust, despite a steering wheel that both tilts and telescopes.

50 miles per gallon

The radio reception is weak and the stereo sound is just average.

50 miles per gallon

The gas mileage readout is always optimistic and the miles to empty is pessimistic.

50 miles per gallon

The engine makes a mournful, muted attempt to roar when asked for full power.

50 miles per gallon

The power button, that combines the power of the electric motors and the gasoline engine is addicting. It feels like the hand of god pushing you past other vehicles or onto freeways. You can easily get to 60 mph in under ten seconds. There is also a gear for holding the car in gear for mountain driving. You can also beg the dealer to disconnect the beeping sound every time you put the car in reverse (can you say garbage truck backing-up warning?) and the dash readouts cast a reflection in the side glass.

50 miles per gallon

On a windy day the Prius’ large slab sides can create a sail effect   making it important to keep both hands on the wheel.

50 miles per gallon.

The front spoiler is very low and it can easily hit the pavement on even minor inclines. Approach these with caution. Trust us.

50 miles per gallon.

Mom’s view: Love it.

Dad’s view: Let’s buy it.

Working woman’s view: Easy to park and live with/

Young working male’s view: Certainly not a babe magnet. Well, maybe in black with chrome wheels.

Consensus: Difficult to ignore 50 miles per gallon.

For a list of all vehicle websites go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

Here is a comparison of the 2010 versus the 2009 Toyota Prius.

2010                                    2009

Price $23,500             $20,900

Turning Radius 34.2 ft. 34.1 ft.

Mileage City 51/48 mpg. 48/45 mpg.

Length 175.6 in. 175 in.

Width 68.7 in. 67.9 in.

Height 58.7 in. 58.7 in.

Weight 3042 lbs. 2932 lbs.

Front Headroom 38.6 in. 39.1 in.

Rear Headroom 37.6 in. 37.3 in.

Front Hip Room 52.7 in. 51 in.

Front Leg Room 42.5 in. 41.9 in.

Rear Leg Room 36 in. 38.6 in.

Cargo Room 21.6 cu. ft. 14.4 cu. ft.

Engine size 1.8 liters 1.5 liters

Total Horsepower 134 hp 1 110 hp

Electric Output (Kilowatts) 60 50

Horsepower (Gas Motor) 98 hp 76 hp

Torque (Gas Motor) 105 ft-lbs. 82 ft-lbs

Tires P195/65R15 P185/65R15 86
Wheels alloy 15 x 6.0 in. 15 x 5.5 in. e

Brakes – Front ventilated disc ventilated disc

Brakes – Rear disc drum

CD In-Dash 6 CD player single CD player

Total Number of Speakers Eight Six

Source Edmunds.Com

Cash for Clunkers: What Cars Qualify?

By The Car Family

http://www.motorists.org/blog/the-best-new-cars-for-2008

THIS PROGRAM ENDS ABOUT AUGUST 24th.

(You might consider taking that new vehicle and trading up to one above the government’s limit if it meets your needs better. )

The Consumer Assistance Recycle and Save Act of 2009, or “Cash for Clunkers,” is a program designed to get gas hogs and heavy polluters off the road and stimulate new car sales. The federal government is going to provide a voucher of up to $4,500 to the dealer to help reduce the cost of the new car by that amount. It even extends to leases.

Unfortunately, the law really isn’t strict enough as you can sell a gas hog that gets 16 mpg and buy a new one that achieves just 18mpg and still get the credit. Makes no sense unless you are selling large SUVs, the bread and butter of the domestic car manufacturers. Hummm.

There are a lot of other problems with the legislation such as how many people driving around vehicles worth under $4,500 qualify for a new car loan. Of course, The Car Family drives a 1980 Mercedes 240 diesel worth under $1000 and could probably qualify. The old car spews smoke, although the engine is still tight after 400,000 or more miles, but its 28 mpg efficiency makes it ineligible. Oh, well. We would have used the money to buy a new Jetta or Mercedes diesel anyway and the government is also providing a stimulus check to buyers of those vehicles as well.

The clunkers program is set to run July 1 through November 1, but the devil is in the details including what dealers are supposed to do with the trade-ins.

Here are the rules and some FAQs:

Eligible vehicles are those that are drivable, made in the last 25 years, insured by the same owner for at least one year leading up to the trade in, have a combined fuel economy rating of no more than 18 mpg according to http://www. fueleconomy.gov and you are buying a car with a sticker of $45,000 or less. You can use the voucher to purchase a new passenger car that achieves at least 22 mpg or model four more miles to the gallon than the old car to get a $3500 credit. If the new car is rated at over 10 mpg more you get the full $4500 is yours. As for pick-up trucks, SUVs, and minivans, the new hauler must have a rating of 18 mpg with the same qualifications as the passenger car to get the $3500 voucher. But, if the new vehicle gets 5 mpg more help yourself to the full $4500. Dah.

We would recommend you do a lot of shopping first and don’t tell the dealer about the voucher because it comes after you make the best deal. You are entitled to all the reductions offered by the dealer and manufacture. What is really nice is that if you do your homework and get a vehicle priced in the $10.000 range, and there are some very good ones from Kia and Nissan, you can have a new car in your possession for $6000. And, don’t bother looking at motorcycles as they don’t qualify and neither do used vehicles. However, the funds can be used for a lease that runs at least five years.

After you find the best price you need to bring into the dealership the car’s title and insurance and registration showing that it has been yours for at least one year.

The program starts July 1, 2009. The best place to find data is

http://www.cashforclunkersfacts.com/CARS-Law.pdf

For a list of all vehicle websites go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html

Volkswagen Jetta SportsWagon and Sedan: Diesel and Gas

By

The Car Family

For more reviews go to

http://www.motorists.org/blog/the-best-new-cars-for-2008

For a base price under $20,000 you can acquire ownership in one of the best station wagons available providing you don’t mind a stiff legged ride and highly dentable side panels. We tired to like the Jetta SportsWagon equipped with the 2.5 liter 5 cylinder engine and five-speed manual transmission but even with gas mileage consistently in mid 20 mpg range, the hard seats, intrusive transmission tunnel, and the deplorable reception of the stereo told us wait for the diesel model to test. The reason is simple, why not pay a little extra and get over 10 mpg more, have less costly maintenance, and a higher resale that would make all the other items disappear at you pass yet another service station on your way to 500 miles or more on a full tank of diesel? We are talking love here. You know, the kind of love that comes with knowing that things might not be perfect, but dependability and charm can salve a lot of door dings.

We highly recommend the optional six-speed automatic with Tiptronic over the manual transmission mainly because the clutch on the stick shift has such a high take up point that it makes it more difficult to shift if you have shorter legs. Besides, there is virtually nothing to favor the standard transmission in terms of gas mileage and resale will be less with the manual.

Dad’s view: The 170-hp 2.5-liter 5-cylinder engine with the five speed manual transmission had just enough energy to carry the family with some frisk and the gas mileage was about 23 mpg in mixed driving. You can also order the optional 2.0 liter, turbocharged 4-cylinder engine that makes 200 hp and is much more willing to be playful. However, I would go with the TDI version and its 2.0 liter turbocharged diesel engine that provides 140hp and a useful 236lb.ft. of torque. These engines can be ordered with a five-speed manual or optional six-speed automatic.

The suspension is all independent suspension with MacPherson struts in front and a multi-link rear. The rack and pinion steering is nicely weighted for town or highway. The ride is very sporty and works well with the Jetta’s disc brakes measuring 12.2 inches and 11.6 inches in back respectively.

Except for the hard seats, questionable air conditioning performance, and the expensive optional stereo and GPS, this would be a good choice for a family or for anyone who wants both a sporty ride and an economical one.

Mom’s view: Not a bad looking station wagon with exceptional visibility and maneuverability. I’m not sure about some of the options such as the overly complicated stereo and GPS and the panoramic sunroof isn’t something I would order in a Jetta. However, it is well engineered and has an Eos convertible type of mechanism that lets it open and raise in part. The electric sunshade remained closed during most of our rain filled days with the surefooted wagon. The rear hatch is very easy to open, but someone didn’t ask the ladies where to put the opening latch. The designers decided that the dirtiest place on a wagon would be best, right above the rear bumper. I can’t imagine any women living in the snow belt who is going to appreciate that location.

Safety wise the Volkswagen Jetta wagon has ABS, traction control, electronic stability control, front passenger front airbag, side airbags, and side curtain protection for front and rear riders. The Jetta also has daytime running lamps and directional signal lights on the side-mirrors. The car feels heavier then it is and you aren’t going to find a better handling wagon outside of the BMW, and that costs at least twenty thousand dollars more.

Driving the Jetta takes time to adjust to as it has quick steering, a sturdy suspension, and a bit of wind noise that can get a bit tiring. I like the the GLI’s turbo 4-cylinder most, but the diesel is a sweetheart. It uses urea to clean the exhaust and you only hear a bit of diesel chatter at idle. The controls are handy, but the radio is in need of a rethink. The navigation system is very weak and we were unable to find a restaurant by name. The system also works slowly. Night lighting is very good and the interior lighting adequate. On the sedan, the trunk opens perfectly when you use the remote. I couldn’t find a place to open it with just the key, but that could just be me and often is.

I would find owning a diesel Jetta quite easy to validate. It is well priced and the resale on the diesel should be excellent. Pretty, perky, and poised when challenged by curves and tight city parking situations, it certainly deserves a long test drive.

Young working male’s view: Order the 140hp diesel version. It is easy to get well over 40 mpg and the range can be in excess of 500 miles. Plenty of low end pep, but don’t count on it being frisky past 80 mph. The turbocharged, four-cylinder, gas engine is much quicker and the turbo lag is almost non-existent. The automatic transmission has a manual shift gate, which is easy to use and a real plus in the mountains. The diesel model can be a bit rude when just starting out as it tends to lurch at times. This may be an anomaly so we are testing another model later this year.

The visibility is good in all directions, but it is much better if you take down the rear headrests when they are not in use. and it has a fairly tight, 35.8 ft., turning radius so it is easy to park.

The stereo is adequate, with poor radio reception. I would replace it or get a high end model if you really want that new car sound. It is clearly better then the competition in the form of the Subaru, Hyundai Elantra, Audi, and Mazda wagons when it comes to combining both economy, room, and handling.

In terms of comfort, the front seats need to be made larger and softer. There is a good amount of travel on the seating tracks and the steering wheel both telescopes and tilts.

The backseats are fine for most everyone, but getting three adults in would be a challenge. Not my type of vehicle, but certainly one that would be interesting if I traveled more. For the same price I can get a new Toyota Prius that gets better in-town fuel mileage and I can also drive in the high occupancy lanes.

Working woman’s view: Very much my kind of car. The wagon has nearly 68 cubic ft. of cargo space and there are a lot of small storage areas for change and a clutch-bag. The center arm rest contains a place for a cell phone and there is even a small, pizza box sized storage area under the wagon’s rear floor covering. The wagon’s back seats don’t really fold flat, but it really wasn’t much of a concern especially since the front-passenger seatback folds down to provide even more room for longer packages.

The Jetta looks modern and feels tight. My only possible worry would be the lack of high customer satisfaction scores and the high prices of some of the options. The latter can be alleviated by just sticking to the basics and the Jetta has plenty. This VW comes standard with air conditioning, a pollen filter, heated outside mirrors, speed adjustable wipers, a AM-FM-MP3, CD player, cruise-control, a handy 12-volt power outlet, keyless entry, power windows and a central locking system, self-dimming rear-view mirror, and grab handles at each door. I would like to own the Jetta diesel wagon without the Sport option. It is an ideal touring vehicle and commuter car.

Family conference: Easily the best new station wagon considering the versatility, pricing, and fuel economy. A station wagon makes great sense for a family and shouldn’t be overlooked by those who like to have a little fun with their economy.

For a list of all vehicle websites go to http://www.reacheverychild.com/business/index.html